ReviewEFORT open reviews2019
Impact of hip arthroplasty registers on orthopaedic practice and perspectives for the future.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Femoral Stem Fracture in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Systematic Literature Review of the Real-World Evidence.Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie · 2022Pooled it
- Risk of revision arthroplasty surgery after exposure to physically demanding occupational or leisure activities: A systematic review.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Factors influencing prosthesis selection and variation: a national survey of orthopaedic surgeons in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Draft of a national arthroplasty registry prototype in Burkina Faso, West Africa.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers.Acta orthopaedica · 2024Article
- Over a decade of experience in total knee arthroplasty with a multiradius design and fixed bearing at a single centre: Data from the Catalan Arthroplasty Registry.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Do all short stem types restore biomechanical parameters of the hip? Comparison according to femoral neck osteotomy levels.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Enhancing the data capture of periprosthetic joint infections in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry: validity assessment and incidence estimation.Acta orthopaedica · 2024Observational
- Article
- Intracardiac leakage of cement during artificial femoral head replacement: a case report and review.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2024Article
- National Joint Registry recorded untoward intraoperative events during primary total hip arthroplasty: an investigation into the data accuracy, causal mechanisms and attributability.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023Article
- Cutting-Edge Approaches in Arthroplasty: Before, during and after Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Understanding orthopedic infections through a different perspective: Microcalorimetry growth curves.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Article
- The First Report of the International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society's Global Registry.Cartilage · 2021Review
- The rise of registry-based research: a bibliometric analysis.Acta orthopaedica · 2021Review
- Development of a diagnostic algorithm identifying cases of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty-based on 31,762 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.Acta orthopaedica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) registers are established in several countries to collect data aiming to improve the results after THA. Monitoring of adverse outcomes after THA has focused mainly on revision surgery, but patient-reported outcomes have also been investigated.Several surgery-related factors influencing the survival of the THA have been thoroughly investigated and have changed clinical practice. These factors include surgical approach, specific implants, the size of the components, type of fixation and different bone cements.Register data have been used to examine the risk of venous thromboembolism and bleeding after THA. These investigations have resulted in shorter duration of thromboprophylaxis and a reduced frequency of blood transfusion.Registers may provide specific information to surgeons on the outcome of all THAs that they have performed with a detailed analysis of revisions rates and reasons for the revisions.A number of other stakeholders can use register data to provide benchmarks. The National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man supplies data to the Orthopaedic Device Evaluation Panel (ODEP), which provides benchmarks at 3, 5, 7, 10, and 13 years graded from A*, A, B and C.Future perspectives: National registers have to play a major role in documenting the quality of THA in order to describe best practice and report implant outliers. The registers have to be used for research and post-market surveillance and register data may be a source for intelligent decision tools. Cite this article:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.