ReviewEFORT open reviews2019
Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.
- Weighing the impact of evidence in orthopaedic trauma registries: a systematic review of national and international registry data.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of qualitative studies examining barriers and facilitators to orthopaedic surgeon engagement with patient-reported outcome measures data.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- Can prediction models for hospital readmission be improved by incorporating patient-reported outcome measures? A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
- Lower limb post-traumatic osteomyelitis: a systematic review of clinical outcomes.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Pooled it
- Total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis for patients aged 50-85 years with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis: the TARVA RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Exploring the impact of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) among orthopaedic surgeons in mainland China: systematic review and survey-based study on hip and knee instruments.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review and standardised assessment of Chinese cross-cultural adapted hip Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Evaluating a web-based personalized decision report for total knee or hip replacement: Lessons learned from patients.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2023Trial
- [Expert consensus on clinical pathway for high-conformity total knee arthroplasty through a minimally invasive surgical approach].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Does lateralization and distalization affect revision rates and patient experience in primary stemmed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?JSES international · 2026Article
- 1-year results after surgery for flexible adult-acquired flatfoot deformity: a cohort study based on 190 patients from the Swedish Foot and Ankle Surgery Register.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Article
- Clinical and Demographic Factors Associated With Baseline PROMIS Categorization in Shoulder and Elbow Patients.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- [PROMs as instruments for outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty in three different EndoCert-Certified institutional surgical settings].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Draft of a national arthroplasty registry prototype in Burkina Faso, West Africa.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Utility of PROM Questionnaires: Correlation of Question Burden and Response Rate Among Surgically Treated Patients with Musculoskeletal Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Variation in hip replacement rates and surgical workforce across Nordic European countries.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- The Role of Proximal Femoral Osteotomy for the Treatment of Avascular Necrosis: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Branding a New Technological Outlook for Future Orthopaedics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Arthroplasty registries at a glance: an initiative of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) to facilitate access, understanding, and reporting of registry data from an international perspective.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- Health-related quality of life after rehabilitation from knee surgery in rural and urban settings: a quasi-experimental study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total joint arthroplasty is performed to decreased pain, restore function and productivity and improve quality of life.One-year implant survivorship following surgery is nearly 100%; however, self-reported satisfaction is 80% after total knee arthroplasty and 90% after total hip arthroplasty.Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are produced by patients reporting on their own health status directly without interpretation from a surgeon or other medical professional; a PRO measure (PROM) is a tool, often a questionnaire, that measures different aspects of patient-related outcomes.Generic PROs are related to a patient's general health and quality of life, whereas a specific PRO is focused on a particular disease, symptom or anatomical region.While revision surgery is the traditional endpoint of registries, it is blunt and likely insufficient as a measure of success; PROMs address this shortcoming by expanding beyond survival and measuring outcomes that are relevant to patients - relief of pain, restoration of function and improvement in quality of life.PROMs are increasing in use in many national and regional orthopaedic arthroplasty registries.PROMs data can provide important information on value-based care, support quality assurance and improvement initiatives, help refine surgical indications and may improve shared decision-making and surgical timing.There are several practical considerations that need to be considered when implementing PROMs collection, as the undertaking itself may be expensive, a burden to the patient, as well as being time and labour intensive. Cite this article:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.