Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31210923›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2019

How Clinical Practice Research Datalink data are used to support pharmacovigilance.

Rebecca E Ghosh, Elizabeth Crellin, Sue Beatty, Katherine Donegan, Puja Myles, Rachael Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pharmacoepidemiology: An Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebecca E GhoshClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6009-3040
Elizabeth CrellinClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Sue BeattyClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Katherine DoneganVigilance and Risk Management of Medicines, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Puja MylesClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.
Rachael WilliamsClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacovigilance can be defined as the science of monitoring medicines and vaccines after license for use, the purpose of which is to quantify and characterise the safety profile of a medicine, identify previously unknown adverse reactions, inform risk-benefit assessment, and support the development of actions that can be taken to reduce risks, optimise benefits and monitor their effectiveness. This review discusses the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), which is the source of the largest research database in the UK with longitudinal, representative primary care data linked to data from other healthcare settings. CPRD supports international pharmacovigilance by providing a large, anonymised representative general population database with comprehensive capture of patient risk factors and outcomes to researchers within academic, regulatory and pharmaceutical organisations. The specific advantages of CPRD data are discussed in the context of the 'six Vs of big data' including volume, velocity, variety, veracity, validity and value. Examples of where CPRD data have been used for pharmacovigilance research and how these have fed into guidelines and policy are discussed.

Indexed as

big dataelectronic health recordsmedical record linkagepharmacovigilanceprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID31210923
PMCPMC6545638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.