ArticleTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2019
Differential clusters of modifiable risk factors for impaired fasting glucose
Article in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Factors for Metabolic Non-Response to a Complex Lifestyle Intervention-A Replication Analysis to a Randomized-Controlled Trial.Nutrients · 2022Trial
- Prediabetes Phenotypes and Adiposity Patterns: Findings From a Population-Based Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Associations of the fat-free mass index and the fat mass index with the risk of developing diabetes and prediabetes in US adults: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.Lipids in health and disease · 2024Article
- Higher systemic immune-inflammation index is associated with sarcopenia in individuals aged 18-59 years: a population-based study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Prevalence and Characteristics of Prediabetes and Metabolic Syndrome in Seemingly Healthy Persons at a Health Check-Up Clinic.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to identify modifiable risk factors associated with isolated impaired fasting glucose (IFG), isolate impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or combined IFG-IGT in men and women aged 50 years and older.
methodsCross-sectional analyses were performed in 703 men and women aged between 50 and 80 years old from NHANES (2007-2008). Outcome variables: IFG and IGT (ADA 2003), estimated body composition, cardiometabolic profile, and socio-demographic, dietary, and lifestyle factors.
resultsFirst, 235 had normal glucose tolerance (men = 38.3%, women = 61.7%), 243 had IFG (men = 61.7%, women = 38.3%), 67 had IGT (men = 40.3%, women = 59.7%) and 158 had both conditions (men = 57.0%, women = 43.0%). The only common determinant of both IFG and IGT was triglyceride levels. High total fat mass index (FMI) and high total fat-free mass index (FFMI) were independently associated with IFG; while high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were independently associated with IGT. Finally, combined IFG-IGT was associated with inadequate fiber intake, high FMI, FFMI, and CRP levels.
conclusionsMiddle-age and older individuals presented different modifiable risk factors depending on whether they had IFG or IGT. IFG was associated with deteriorated body composition and lipids, whereas IGT was associated with deteriorated lipids and inflammatory factors. IFG-IGT, on the other hand, was associated with a larger number of risk factors, including worsen body composition, cardiometabolic and dietary factors. To prevent the transition to type 2 diabetes, specific clinical interventions targeting these risk factors should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.