ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2019
Faculty and Resident Perspectives on Using Entrustment Anchors for Workplace-Based Assessment.
Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of the ICO-OCEX tool for competency-based assessment in ophthalmology residency programs.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Beyond the Numbers: Exploring Tensions Between Formal Entrustment and Trainee Readiness in Internship Training - A Mixed-Methods Study.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Home Field Advantage? Comparing the Quality of EPA Observations Completed On- vs Off-Service.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025Article
- Assessing supervisor versus trainee viewpoints of entrustment through cognitive and affective lenses: an artificial intelligence investigation of bias in feedback.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024Article
- Accuracy of Entrustment-Based Assessment: Implications for Programs and Patients.Journal of graduate medical education · 2024Article
- Validation of a form for assessing the professional performance of residents in cardiology by nurses.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- Implementation of Entrustable Professional Activities assessments in a Canadian obstetrics and gynecology residency program: a mixed methods study.Canadian medical education journal · 2022Article
- How Do Clerkship Students Use EPA Data? Illuminating Students' Perspectives as Partners in Programs of Assessment.Medical science educator · 2021Article
- Article
- The Ottawa Emergency Department Shift Observation Tool (O-EDShOT): A New Tool for Assessing Resident Competence in the Emergency Department.AEM education and training · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch suggests that workplace-based assessment (WBA) tools using entrustment anchors provide more reliable assessments than those using traditional anchors. There is a lack of evidence describing how and why entrustment anchors work.
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to better understand the experience of residents and faculty with respect to traditional and entrustment anchors.
methodsWe used constructivist grounded theory to guide data collection and analysis (March-December 2017) and semistructured interviews to gather reflections on anchors. Phase 1 involved residents and faculty (n = 12) who had only used assessment tools with traditional anchors. Phase 2 involved participants who had used tools with entrustment anchors (n = 10). Data were analyzed iteratively.
resultsParticipants expressed that the pragmatic language of entrustment anchors made WBA (1)
conclusionsInsights from this analysis contribute to a theoretical framework of benefits and challenges related to the adoption of entrustment anchors. This richer understanding of faculty and resident perspectives of entrustment anchors may assist WBA developers in creating more acceptable tools and inform the necessary faculty development initiatives that must accompany the use of these new WBA tools. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.