ArticleScanning2019
Evaluation of the Dislodgement Resistance of a New Pozzolan-Based Cement (EndoSeal MTA) Compared to ProRoot MTA and Biodentine in the Presence and Absence of Blood.
Article in Scanning, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Push-out bond strength of the calcium silicate-based endodontic cements in the presence of blood: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of push-out bond strength and Si QScientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating the feasibility of calcium silicate-based sealers for strip perforation repair compared to mineral trioxide aggregate: an in-vitro study on bond strength.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Retrieval of AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, and Endoseal MTA in Endodontic Retreatment: An in Vitro Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.Frontiers in dentistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Removal efficiency of a fast setting pozzalan-based bioactive cement: a micro CT study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Molecular Identification ofJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2023Article
- Sol-Gel Technologies to Obtain Advanced Bioceramics for Dental Therapeutics.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comparison of the effect of post space preparation time on the apical seal of two different sealers.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- Modified Mineral Trioxide Aggregate-A Versatile Dental Material: An Insight on Applications and Newer Advancements.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Article
- Comparison of Bacterial Microleakage of Endoseal MTA Sealer and Pro-Root MTA in Root Perforation.Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2021Article
- Review
- Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the flow and filling ability of endodontic materials using different test models.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2020Article
- The Effect ofIranian endodontic journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis
methodsStandard furcal perforations were created in 180 human mandibular first molars. The teeth were randomly allocated to 12 groups of 15 each. ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and EndoSeal MTA were used to repair the perforations. In half of the samples, the walls of the perforated areas were contaminated with blood, whereas saline was injected into the other half. A push-out test was performed using a universal testing machine after 24 hours or 7 days. To evaluate failure patterns, the samples were split into half and were examined under a stereomicroscope at a 20x magnification. Data were analyzed using three-way analysis of variance, Tukey test, and Student's
resultsAt both time intervals and in the presence and absence of contamination with blood, ProRoot MTA and Biodentine had significantly higher retention values than EndoSeal MTA (
conclusionsProRoot MTA and Biodentine showed higher values of bond strength than EndoSeal MTA and may thus be better options for the repair of root perforations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.