Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31210800›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2019

Neoadjuvant zoledronic acid for HER2-positive breast cancer: the Zo-NAnTax trial.

Susanne Crocamo, Renata Binato, Bruno de Paula, Giselle Vignal, Lídia Magalhães, Roberta Sarmento, Maria Theresa Accioly, Isabele Small, Sandra Gioia, Pedro Maroun and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne CrocamoDepartment of Clinical Research in Breast Cancer, Cancer Hospital III/NCI, Rua Visconde de Santa Isabel no 274, Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5463-5517
Renata BinatoNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bruno de PaulaNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Giselle VignalNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lídia MagalhãesNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Roberta SarmentoNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Theresa AcciolyNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Isabele SmallNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sandra GioiaNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Pedro MarounNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Pamela MoutinhoNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Vivianne FreitasNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2563-0861
Karuline CateinNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Eliana AbdelhayNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA · BRHospital do Câncer III · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical evidence suggests that zoledronic acid (ZOL) works synergistically with chemotherapy by enhancing anti-tumor activity. ZOL blocks the mevalonate pathway and may indirectly interact with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) pathway activation. The clinical efficacy and biological rationale of chemotherapy plus anti-HER2 therapy and ZOL as a part of neoadjuvant therapy has not been previously tested. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ZOL as part of a neoadjuvant treatment in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). The protocol consisted of four cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide with ZOL, followed by four cycles of docetaxel with trastuzumab and ZOL prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints were safety and the identification of clinicopathological characteristics associated with pCR.

resultsA total of 71 patients with stage IIA to IIIB BC were included, with 60 eligible for the safety assessment and 58 for the efficacy analysis. Overall, the pCR rate was 42%, with higher rates in hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors (40%), which contrasts with the results of pivotal trials. The most commonly observed grade 3 and 4 events were febrile neutropenia (grade 3, 20%; grade 4, 3%) and diarrhea (grade 3, 12%).

conclusionsThe addition of ZOL as a repositioning drug in neoadjuvant treatment was an effective and well-tolerated therapy. This drug combination might overcome endocrine and anti-HER2 resistance. The higher pCR rates in the HR-positive subgroup deserve further translational investigation.

Indexed as

HER2-positive/HR-positive breast cancerneoadjuvant therapypathological complete responsetrastuzumabzoledronic acid

Identifiers

PMID31210800
PMCPMC6545654
OpenAlexW2947875830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.