Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31210716›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Novel risk scoring system for prediction of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Ye Li, Fang Zhou, Dong-Ming Zhu, Zi-Xiang Zhang, Jian Yang, Jun Yao, Yi-Jun Wei, Ya-Ling Xu, Dei-Chun Li, Jian Zhou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05654636 (Evaluation of Sun's Scoring System Use in Post-pancraticodoudenectomy Pancreatic Fistula; an Observational Cohort Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05654636 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Sun's Scoring System Use in Post-pancraticodoudenectomy Pancreatic Fistula; an Observational Cohort Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsRisk Scoring System for Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula Post PD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ye LiDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Fang ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Dong-Ming ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zi-Xiang ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jian YangDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jun YaoDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yi-Jun WeiDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Ya-Ling XuDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Dei-Chun LiDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jian ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe available prediction models for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) do not incorporate both preoperative and intraoperative variables.

aimTo construct a new risk scoring system for CR-POPF that includes both preoperative and intraoperative factors.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or pylorus-preserving PD (PPPD) between January 2011 and December 2016 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Patients were divided into a study (01/2011 to 12/2014) or validation (01/2015 to 12/2016) group according to the time of admission. POPF severity was classified into three grades: Biochemical leak (grade A) and CR-POPF (grades B and C). Logistic regression was used to create a predictive scoring system.

resultsPreoperative serum albumin ≥ 35 g/L [

conclusionThis study established a 10-point scoring system to predict CR-POPF after PD/PPPD using preoperative and intraoperative parameters. Ultimately, this system could be used to distinguish between high- and low-risk populations in order to facilitate timely interventions after PD.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIntraoperative PeriodMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative PeriodPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentROC CurveComplicationsPancreatic fistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperativePredictive modelRisk factorScoring system

Identifiers

PMID31210716
PMCPMC6558436
OpenAlexW2948338247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.