Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31210712›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Where do we stand?

Francesco Santopaolo, Ilaria Lenci, Martina Milana, Tommaso Maria Manzia, Leonardo Baiocchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. World journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Emerging roles of stress granules in liver diseases: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesco SantopaoloHepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy.
Ilaria LenciHepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy.
Martina MilanaHepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy.
Tommaso Maria ManziaTransplant Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy.
Leonardo BaiocchiHepatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy. baiocchi@uniroma2.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma represents an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is the sixth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death. Liver transplantation is a key tool for the treatment of this disease in human therefore hepatocellular carcinoma is increasing as primary indication for grafting. Although liver transplantation represents an outstanding therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, due to organ shortage, the careful selection and management of patients who may have a major survival benefit after grafting remains a fundamental question. In fact, only some stages of the disease seem amenable of this therapeutic option, stimulating the debate on the appropriate criteria to select candidates. In this review we focused on current criteria to select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma for liver transplantation as well as on the strategies (bridging) to avoid disease progression and exclusion from grafting during the stay on wait list. The treatments used to bring patients within acceptable criteria (down-staging), when their tumor burden exceeds the standard criteria for transplant, are also reported. Finally, we examined tumor reappearance following liver transplantation. This occurrence is estimated to be approximately 8%-20% in different studies. The possible approaches to prevent this outcome after transplant are reported with the corresponding results.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAllograftsCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionEmbolization, TherapeuticHealth Care RationingHumansLiverLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationMedical OncologyNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingObservational Studies as TopicBridgingDown-stagingHepatocellular carcinomaLiver transplantationMilan Criteria

Identifiers

PMID31210712
PMCPMC6558441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.