Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31210680›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2019

Care for low back pain: can health systems deliver?

Adrian C Traeger, Rachelle Buchbinder, Adam G Elshaug, Peter R Croft, Chris G Maher

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06431503 (Effect of Tok-Sen Massage for Non-specific Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 104 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06431503 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Tok-Sen Massage for Non-specific Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorChina Medical University HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled12ConditionsNon-specific Chronic Low Back PainArmsTok-Sen Massage, Pressure Massage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Clinical pathways for the management of low back pain from primary to specialised care: a systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. A Hospital Avoidance Pathway With Digitally Supported Follow-Up for Low Back Pain: An Alternative to Emergency Department Care.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian C TraegerInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney, PO Box M179, Missenden Road, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.
Rachelle BuchbinderDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Adam G ElshaugMenzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Peter R CroftInstitute of Primary and Health Care Sciences, Keele University, Newcastle, England.
Chris G MaherInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney, PO Box M179, Missenden Road, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.
Menzies School of Health Research · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low back pain is the leading cause of years lived with disability globally. In 2018, an international working group called on the World Health Organization to increase attention on the burden of low back pain and the need to avoid excessively medical solutions. Indeed, major international clinical guidelines now recognize that many people with low back pain require little or no formal treatment. Where treatment is required the recommended approach is to discourage use of pain medication, steroid injections and spinal surgery, and instead promote physical and psychological therapies. Many health systems are not designed to support this approach. In this paper we discuss why care for low back pain that is concordant with guidelines requires system-wide changes. We detail the key challenges of low back pain care within health systems. These include the financial interests of pharmaceutical and other companies; outdated payment systems that favour medical care over patients' self-management; and deep-rooted medical traditions and beliefs about care for back pain among physicians and the public. We give international examples of promising solutions and policies and practices for health systems facing an increasing burden of ineffective care for low back pain. We suggest policies that, by shifting resources from unnecessary care to guideline-concordant care for low back pain, could be cost-neutral and have widespread impact. Small adjustments to health policy will not work in isolation, however. Workplace systems, legal frameworks, personal beliefs, politics and the overall societal context in which we experience health, will also need to change.

Indexed as

Health PolicyLow Back PainPractice Guidelines as TopicEducation, MedicalGuideline AdherenceHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPhysiciansWorkplaceWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID31210680
PMCPMC6560373
OpenAlexW2947696032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.