Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31210271›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2019

Chickspress: a resource for chicken gene expression.

Fiona M McCarthy, Ken Pendarvis, Amanda M Cooksey, Cathy R Gresham, Matt Bomhoff, Sean Davey, Eric Lyons, Tad S Sonstegard, Susan M Bridges, Shane C Burgess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AgAnimalGenomes: browsers for viewing and manually annotating farm animal genomes.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Structure of the intergenic spacers in chicken ribosomal DNA.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fiona M McCarthySchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ, USA.
Ken PendarvisSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ, USA.
Amanda M CookseySchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ, USA.
Cathy R GreshamInstitute of Genomics, Biocomputing & Biotechnology, Mississippi State University, Starkville MS, USA.
Matt BomhoffSchool of Plant Sciences, CyVerse, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ , USA.
Sean DaveySchool of Plant Sciences, CyVerse, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ , USA.
Eric LyonsSchool of Plant Sciences, CyVerse, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ , USA.
Tad S SonstegardUnited States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Beltsville MD, USA.
Susan M BridgesDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville MS, USA.
Shane C BurgessSchool of Animal and Comparative Biomedical Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ, USA.

Funding

Experimental annotation of the chicken genomeR24GM079326 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BURGESS, SHANE C · 2008 to 2013
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM079326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing and proteomics technologies are markedly increasing the amount of RNA and peptide data that are available to researchers, which are typically made publicly available via data repositories such as the NCBI Sequence Read Archive and proteome archives, respectively. These data sets contain valuable information about when and where gene products are expressed, but this information is not readily obtainable from archived data sets. Here we report Chickspress (http://geneatlas.arl.arizona.edu), the first publicly available gene expression resource for chicken tissues. Since there is no single source of chicken gene models, Chickspress incorporates both NCBI and Ensembl gene models and links these gene sets with experimental gene expression data and QTL information. By linking gene models from both NCBI and Ensembl gene prediction pipelines, researchers can, for the first time, easily compare gene models from each of these prediction workflows to available experimental data for these products. We use Chickspress data to show the differences between these gene annotation pipelines. Chickspress also provides rapid search, visualization and download capacity for chicken gene sets based upon tissue type, developmental stage and experiment type. This first Chickspress release contains 161 gene expression data sets, including expression of mRNAs, miRNAs, proteins and peptides. We provide several examples demonstrating how researchers may use this resource.

Indexed as

ChickensDatabases, GeneticGene Expression RegulationTranscriptomeAnimalsAvian ProteinsMicroRNAsModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait, HeritableRNA, MessengerAvian ProteinsMicroRNAsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID31210271
PMCPMC6556980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.