ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2019
Impact of the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond.
Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05674500 (A Prospective Study of Standardized Coaching Language to Improve Endoscopy Training Quality), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Study of Standardized Coaching Language to Improve Endoscopy Training Quality
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Augmenting colonoscopy with artificial intelligence and robotic assistance: a human-factors scoping review toward a task-based shared autonomy paradigm.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Integrating Non-technical Skills in Endoscopy into Gastroenterology Training: A National Framework for Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2026Review
- Advanced Competencies for Endoscopy Nurses: A Rapid Review of Current Practices and Training Approaches.Nursing & health sciences · 2026Review
- The impact of photographic image quantity on early upper gastrointestinal cancer detection during esophagogastroduodenoscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Case-mix-adjusted mean number of polyps per 100 procedures: a new candidate gold standard colonoscopy key performance indicator.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- From small steps to big impact: what we learnt from the National Bowel Screening Programme.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Review
- Initiatives to increase colonoscopy capacity - is there an impact on polyp detection? A UK National Endoscopy Database analysis.Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Why is early detection of colon cancer still not possible in 2023?World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Review
- Article
- Young GI angle: Subspecialising in gastroenterology: Needs, challenges and opportunities.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Article
- Global trends in training and credentialing guidelines for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review.Endoscopy international open · 2023Review
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in flexible sigmoidoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- UK endoscopy workload and workforce patterns: is there potential to increase capacity? A BSG analysis of the National Endoscopy Database.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- JAG endoscopy training courses: are they financially sustainable?Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Simulator-based training method in gastrointestinal endoscopy training and currently available simulators.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- A journey towards pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy and its training: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Skills Transfer to Clinical Practice after Hands-On Workshops: An International Survey.Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- UK Joint Advisory Group consensus statements for training and certification in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) was initially established in 1994 to standardise endoscopy training across specialties. Over the last two decades, the position of JAG has evolved to meet its current role of quality assuring all aspects of endoscopy in the UK to provide the highest quality, patient-centred care. Drivers such as changes to healthcare agenda, national audits, advances in research and technology and the advent of population-based cancer screening have underpinned this shift in priority. Over this period, JAG has spearheaded various quality assurance initiatives with support from national stakeholders. These have led to the achievement of notable milestones in endoscopy quality assurance, particularly in the three major areas of: (1) endoscopy training, (2) accreditation of endoscopy services (including the Global Rating Scale), and (3) accreditation of screening endoscopists. These developments have changed the landscape of UK practice, serving as a model to promote excellence in endoscopy. This review provides a summary of JAG initiatives and assesses the impact of JAG on training and endoscopy services within the UK and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.