Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31210028›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2019

Chromosomal aberrations in pregnancy and fetal loss: Insight on the effect of consanguinity, review of 1625 cases.

Kimia Najafi, Soheila Gholami, Azadeh Moshtagh, Masood Bazrgar, Neda Sadatian, Golemaryam Abbasi, Parvin Rostami, Soheila Khalili, Mojgan Babanejad, Bahareh Nourmohammadi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kimia NajafiCytogenetic division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0951-9779
Soheila GholamiCytogenetic division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.
Azadeh MoshtaghCytogenetic division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.
Masood BazrgarCytogenetic division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5453-9576
Neda SadatianCytogenetic division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.
Golemaryam AbbasiCytogenetic division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.
Parvin RostamiMolecular division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.
Soheila KhaliliMolecular division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.
Mojgan BabanejadGenetic Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bahareh NourmohammadiMolecular division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.
Negin Faramarzi GarousMolecular division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein NajmabadiGenetic Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Roxana KariminejadCytogenetic division, Kariminejad - Najmabadi Pathology & Genetics Center, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1943-2391
University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy loss affects 10%-15% of pregnancies and is caused by several factors, maternal and fetal. Most common cause is chromosomal aneuploidy and has traditionally been detected by karyotyping product of conception and/or fetal tissue. In recent years, array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) has been used because of its higher detection and lower failure rates.

methodsDNA was extracted from 1625 products of abortion or fetal tissue. In 1,104 cases both quantitative fluorescent-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and a-CGH, and in 521 cases only a-CGH, was performed.

resultsThe detection rate using QF-PCR and a-CGH is 20% compared to 12.7%, overall, and 15.7%, excluding failed samples, by karyotypes in our center. QF-PCR and a-CGH failed in 1.9% of cases, while the failure rate for karyotypes was 20.1%. The difference of detection and failure rates is significant (p-value < 0.001 and p-value < 0.001 respectively). Unexpectedly we also found a significant difference in frequency of imbalances in related versus unrelated couples. (χ

conclusionIt is highly likely that the pregnancy loss in consanguineous couples is caused by other genetic and immune mechanisms. It is plausible that, through the same mechanism by which single gene disorders have a higher prevalence of manifesting disease in consanguineous couples, they can cause lethal genetic disorders leading to pregnancy loss and intra-uterine fetal death (IUFD) in these couples. Our findings suggest that this is a matter for further study as it will greatly influence the approach to counseling and managing consanguineous couples with pregnancy loss.

Indexed as

AneuploidyConsanguinityAborted FetusAbortion, SpontaneousComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansIranKaryotypingPregnancyarray comparative genomic hybridizationchromosomal abnormalityconsanguinitymiscarriagerecurrent abortion

Identifiers

PMID31210028
PMCPMC6687859
OpenAlexW2951549425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.