ArticleMedical physics2019
Concurrent quantification of magnetic nanoparticles temperature and relaxation time.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A High-Precision Real-Time Temperature Acquisition Method Based on Magnetic Nanoparticles.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Magnetic Particle Spectroscopy for Point-of-Care: A Review on Recent Advances.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Distinguishing Nanoparticle Aggregation from Viscosity Changes in MPS/MSB Detection of Biomarkers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Magnetic nanoparticles and magnetic particle spectroscopy-based bioassays: a 15 year recap.Nano futures · 2022Article
- Investigation of Commercial Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Structural and Magnetic Property Characterization.ACS omega · 2021Article
- Identifying in vivo inflammation using magnetic nanoparticle spectra.Physics in medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Quantification of magnetic nanoparticles by compensating for multiple environment changes simultaneously.Nanoscale · 2020Article
- AC magnetometry with active stabilization and harmonic suppression for magnetic nanoparticle spectroscopy and thermometry.Journal of applied physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe harmonic spectrum of the magnetization of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in the presence of an applied magnetic field can be used to characterize the properties of the microenvironment of the MNPs. The change in temperature and relaxation time has been measured by varying the magnetic field amplitudes or frequency to obtain the harmonic spectrum. However, scaling estimates of temperature or relaxation time are poor if both change simultaneously. In this work, we show that scaling over both the amplitude and frequency of the applied magnetic field allows both the temperature and relaxation to be estimated simultaneously.
methodsThe scaling methods previously used to measure temperature and relaxation times individually have been expanded to two dimensions allowing both parameters to be estimated simultaneously. Samples with different temperature and relaxation times were measured using a magnetic nanoparticle spectrometer to verify this two-dimensional scaling method. Simulations were also carried out for a range of nanoparticle sizes, and the best particle sizes were estimated for this two-dimensional method.
resultsThe two-dimensional scaling method achieved a mean error of 0.83% for relaxation time by considering the temperature variation as well as relaxation time changes. The temperature and viscosity of the MNPs were measured simultaneously with the mean error of 1.03°C and 0.011 mPas. For monodisperse particles with Brownian relaxation, simulation showed that core radius of 16 nm and hydrodynamic radius of 23 nm had best accuracy for the scaling method.
conclusionsThe two-dimensional scaling method allows both temperature and relaxation time to be estimated simultaneously. The measurement accuracy can be improved by combining information in ratios and phases of the magnetic harmonics of the magnetization and by choosing the optimal particle sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.