Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209839›Full record

ArticleDemography2019

Measuring Cohabitation in U.S. National Surveys.

Wendy D Manning, Kara Joyner, Paul Hemez, Cassandra Cupka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rising nonmarital first childbearing among college-educated women: Evidence from three national studies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wendy D ManningCenter for Family and Demographic Research, Department of Sociology, Bowling Green State University, 233 Williams Hall, Bowling Green, OH, 43403, USA. wmannin@bgsu.edu.
Kara JoynerCenter for Family and Demographic Research, Department of Sociology, Bowling Green State University, 233 Williams Hall, Bowling Green, OH, 43403, USA.
Paul HemezCenter for Family and Demographic Research, Department of Sociology, Bowling Green State University, 233 Williams Hall, Bowling Green, OH, 43403, USA.
Cassandra CupkaCenter for Family and Demographic Research, Department of Sociology, Bowling Green State University, 233 Williams Hall, Bowling Green, OH, 43403, USA.

Funding

Computing and Data CoreP2CHD050959 · NICHD · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BROWN, SUSAN L. · 2016 to 2021
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cohabitation is one of the fastest growing family forms in the United States. It is widespread and continues to increase but has not been consistently measured across surveys. It is important to track the quality of data on cohabitation because it has implications for research on the correlates and consequences of cohabitation for adults and children. Recent rounds of the Current Population Survey (CPS), National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY-97), and National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) provide an opportunity to contrast estimates of cohabitation status and experience using nationally representative data sets and assess the quality of data on cohabitation in these data sets. Results demonstrated that the surveys provide similar estimates of current cohabitation status, except the CPS resulted in lower estimates. In terms of cohabitation experience (i.e., having ever cohabited), Add Health produced higher estimates, whereas both the NSFG and NLSY-97 produced lower estimates. We documented a strong education gradient across all surveys, with lower levels of current cohabitation and cohabitating experience and with increases in educational attainment. Racial/ethnic differences in cohabitation were inconsistent across surveys. We discuss aspects of sampling and measurement that potentially explain differences in estimates. Our findings have implications not only for survey design but also for the interpretation of results based on these four national surveys.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsMarital StatusAdultData AccuracyEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleRacial GroupsSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesCohabitationMeasurementSurveysYoung adulthood

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.