ArticleCurrent medical science2019
Colon Interposition for Corrosive Esophageal Stricture: Single Institution Experience with 119 Cases.
Article in Current medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term and long-term management of caustic-induced gastrointestinal injury: An evidence-based practice guidelines.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Guideline
- Pediatric benign esophageal strictures: current understanding from etiology to treatment.Translational pediatrics · 2025Review
- Esophageal reconstruction using a hypopharyngeal anastomosis - a single center experience with review of the literature.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Endoscopic and surgical treatment of refractory caustic esophageal strictures.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Colonic interposition in esophagectomy: an ACS-NSQIP study.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Distal-continual colon interposition for esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy: Two case reports.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Minimally Invasive Retrosternal Esophageal Bypass Using a Mid-Colon Esophagocoloplasty for Corrosive-Induced Esophageal Stricture.World journal of surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The colon is an alternative graft organ for esophageal reconstruction. The present study reviewed our experience with the colon interposition for esophageal replacement following corrosive ingestion, to evaluate the outcomes of colon interposition based on our surgical experience. The clinical data of 119 patients who underwent colon interposition for esophageal replacement from January 2005 to March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The routes of the colon interposition were retrosternal in 119 (100%). The median operative time was 390 min (range: 290-610 min) and the median blood loss was 615 mL (range: 270-2500 mL). Of these 119 patients, the cervical anastomosis was performed at the hypopharynx (n=20, 16.8%), the larynx (n=3, 2.5%), and the cervical esophagus (n=96, 80.7%). Five patients experienced cervical anastomotic leakage (4 cases for esophagus-colon, and one for hypopharynx-colon). One patient experienced wound infection of the abdominal wall. Three patients had injury of recurrent laryngeal nerve and hoarseness. Three patients had stress ulcer with bleeding and treated with octreotide. Two patients suffered from incomplete intestinal obstruction. The postoperative follow-up was made for 12 months in all patients and all of them were alive. In conclusion, The colon is well-suited for esophageal reconstruction. The selection of the colon graft should be flexible and be based on the inspection of blood supply and the length needed. We must therefore make every effort to reduce the number of postoperative complications, and improve the quality of life for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.