ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2020
[
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid and specific immunoPET imaging of Nectin-4 in gastric cancer and non-small cell lung cancer using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Advances in immunoPET/SPECT imaging: The role of Fab and F(ab')Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- ImmunoPET imaging of Trop2 expression in triple-negative breast cancer using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Preclinical Imaging of Prostate Cancer.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- ImmunoPET: Antibody-Based PET Imaging in Solid Tumors.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Evaluation of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Article
- Radiochemical Approaches to Imaging Bacterial Infections: Intracellular versus Extracellular Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA great challenge in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer is distinguishing between indolent or local disease and aggressive or metastatic disease. Antibody-based positron emission tomography (immuno-PET) as a cancer-specific imaging modality could improve diagnosis of primary disease, aid the detection of metastases to regional lymph nodes as well as to distant sites (e.g., bone), and monitor response to therapy. PROCEDURE: In search for a more physiologically relevant disease model, a human prostate stem cell antigen knock-in (hPSCA KI) mouse model was generated. The use of a syngeneic prostate cancer cell line transduced to express human PSCA (RM-9-hPSCA) enabled the evaluation of anti-PSCA immuno-PET in immunocompetent mice and in the context of normal tissue expression of PSCA. Two PSCA-specific humanized antibody fragments, A11 minibody and A2 cys-diabody, were radiolabeled with positron emitters iodine-124 and zirconium-89, respectively ([
resultsThe hPSCA KI mice express PSCA at low levels in the normal prostate, bladder and stomach, reproducing the expression pattern seen in humans. [
conclusionTracer biodistribution was not significantly impacted by normal tissue expression of PSCA. [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.