Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209777›Full record

ReviewDrugs2019

Therapeutic Options for Mucopolysaccharidoses: Current and Emerging Treatments.

Kazuki Sawamoto, Molly Stapleton, Carlos J Alméciga-Díaz, Angela J Espejo-Mojica, Juan Camilo Losada, Diego A Suarez, Shunji Tomatsu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Targeting Neurological Aspects of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: Enzyme Replacement Therapy and Beyond.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nonviral delivery of nCas9 for "safe harbor" integration to treat MPS IVA.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The landscape of CRISPR/Cas9 for inborn errors of metabolism.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kazuki SawamotoNemours Biomedical Research, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, 1600 Rockland Rd, Wilmington, DE, 19899-0269, USA.
Molly StapletonNemours Biomedical Research, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, 1600 Rockland Rd, Wilmington, DE, 19899-0269, USA.
Carlos J Alméciga-DíazInstitute for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism, Faculty of Science, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Angela J Espejo-MojicaInstitute for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism, Faculty of Science, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Juan Camilo LosadaInstitute for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism, Faculty of Science, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Diego A SuarezInstitute for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism, Faculty of Science, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.
Shunji TomatsuNemours Biomedical Research, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, 1600 Rockland Rd, Wilmington, DE, 19899-0269, USA. stomatsu@nemours.org.
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana · COAlfred I. duPont Hospital for Children · USUniversity of Delaware · USUniversity of Shimane · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP18gk0110017National Institutes of Health P30GM114736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are inborn errors of metabolism produced by a deficiency of one of the enzymes involved in the degradation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Although taken separately, each type is rare. As a group, MPS are relatively frequent, with an overall estimated incidence of around 1 in 20,000-25,000 births. Development of therapeutic options for MPS, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), has modified the natural history of many MPS types. In spite of the improvement in some tissues and organs, significant challenges remain unsolved, including blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration and treatment of lesions in avascular cartilage, heart valves, and corneas. Newer approaches, such as intrathecal ERT, ERT with fusion proteins to cross the BBB, gene therapy, substrate reduction therapy (SRT), chaperone therapy, and some combination of these strategies may provide better outcomes for MPS patients in the near future. As early diagnosis and early treatment are imperative to improve therapeutic efficacy, the inclusion of MPS in newborn screening programs should enhance the potential impact of treatment in reducing the morbidity associated with MPS diseases. In this review, we evaluate available treatments, including ERT and HSCT, and future treatments, such as gene therapy, SRT, and chaperone therapy, and describe the advantages and disadvantages. We also assess the current clinical endpoints and biomarkers used in clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdolescentBlood-Brain BarrierChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyDrug CarriersEnzyme Replacement TherapyGenetic TherapyHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMembrane Fusion ProteinsMucopolysaccharidosesPermeabilityTreatment OutcomeDrug CarriersMembrane Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31209777
OpenAlexW2951642052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.