Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209738›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2020

Cognitive Distortions in Gamblers and Non-gamblers of a Representative Spanish Sample.

Marta Labrador, Francisco J Labrador, María Crespo, Enrique Echeburúa, Elisardo Becoña

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cognitive Patterns and Problematic Use of Video Games in Adolescents: A Cluster Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire (CD-Quest) in College Students.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marta LabradorFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas, Ctra. de Húmera, s/n, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain. marlabra@ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8973-5155
Francisco J LabradorFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas, Ctra. de Húmera, s/n, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0175-4117
María CrespoFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Campus de Somosaguas, Ctra. de Húmera, s/n, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8762-7874
Enrique EcheburúaFacultad de Psicología, Universidad del Pais Vasco, Tolosa Hiribidea, 70, 20018, Donostia, Gipuzkoa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7654-0781
Elisardo BecoñaFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Santiago de Compostela, Campus Vida, Calle Xosé María Suárez Núñez, s/n, 15782, Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6639-3834
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive biases or distortions related to gambling, present in all people, are considered a relevant factor in the development of gambling-related problems.

objectiveto establish whether the presence of these biases or cognitive distortions, in gamblers and non-gamblers, is related to the presence of gambling problems.

method3000 people aged 18-81 years, representative of the Spanish adult population, underwent a structured survey.

resultsthe presence of distortions was relevant to distinguish gamblers according to their level of gambling engagement and problems. There is a constant and significant tendency to have more cognitive distortions as gambling problems increase. But not all distortions have the same ability to distinguish between the different groups of gamblers. The results seem to group gamblers into three groups according to the presence of cognitive distortions, from less to more: (1) non-gamblers, (2) low-risk and at-risk gamblers, and (3) problem and pathological gamblers. The relevance of this research and its practical implications for both treatment and prevention work is discussed.

Indexed as

Self EfficacyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBehavior, AddictiveCognitionCognition DisordersFemaleGamblingHumansMaleMiddle AgedRewardSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesCognitive biasCognitive distortionsGamblingPathological gamblingType of gamblers

Identifiers

PMID31209738
OpenAlexW2950962707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.