ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
Hemodynamic consequences of a multilayer flow modulator in aortic dissection.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental andProgress in materials science · 2025Article
- Investigation of the different parameters contributing to bubble sticking inside physiological bifurcations.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- The effect of beta-blockers on hemodynamic parameters in patient-specific blood flow simulations of type-B aortic dissection: a virtual study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Endovascular strategies for post-dissection aortic aneurysm (PDAA).Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aortic dissections are challenging for it remains perplexing to determine when surgical, endovascular, or medical therapies are optimal. We studied the effect of the multilayer flow modulator (MFM) device in patients with different forms of type-B aortic dissections. CT scans were performed pre-, immediately post-MFM implantation, and multiple times within a 24-month follow-up. Three-dimensional reconstructions were created from these scans and the multilayer or single-layer mesh device placed virtually into the true lumen. We observed that MFM device can sufficiently restore flow perfusion, reduce the false lumen, eliminate local flow recirculation, and reduce wall shear stress distribution globally. Single-layer devices can reduce false lumen dimensions; however, they generate local disturbance and recirculation zones in selected areas at specific time points. Moreover, in polar extremes of dissection, the MFM device restored flow to vital organs perfusing vessels independent of effects on luminal patency. Management of aortic dissections should focus on modulation of blood flow, suppression of local recirculation, and restoration of vital organ perfusion rather than primarily restoring vascular lumen morphology. While the latter restores the geometry of the true lumen, only the former restores homeostasis. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.