Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209695›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2019

EECoG-Comp: An Open Source Platform for Concurrent EEG/ECoG Comparisons-Applications to Connectivity Studies.

Qing Wang, Pedro Antonio Valdés-Hernández, Deirel Paz-Linares, Jorge Bosch-Bayard, Naoya Oosugi, Misako Komatsu, Naotaka Fujii, Pedro Antonio Valdés-Sosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Qing WangThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Pedro Antonio Valdés-HernándezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Deirel Paz-LinaresThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jorge Bosch-BayardUnity of Neurodevelopment, Institute of Neurobiology, UNAM, Campus Juriquilla, Santiago de Querétaro, Querétaro, Mexico.
Naoya OosugiLaboratory for Adaptive Intelligence, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan.
Misako KomatsuLaboratory for Molecular Analysis of Higher Brain Function, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Saitama, Japan.
Naotaka FujiiLaboratory for Adaptive Intelligence, RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Saitama, Japan.
Pedro Antonio Valdés-SosaThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. pedro.valdes@neuroinformatics-collaboratory.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrophysiological Source Imaging (ESI) is hampered by lack of "gold standards" for model validation. Concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocorticography (ECoG) experiments (EECoG) are useful for this purpose, especially primate models due to their flexibility and translational value for human research. Unfortunately, there is only one EECoG experiments in the public domain that we know of: the Multidimensional Recording (MDR) is based on a single monkey ( www.neurotycho.org ). The mining of this type of data is hindered by lack of specialized procedures to deal with: (1) Severe EECoG artifacts due to the experimental produces; (2) Sophisticated forward models that account for surgery induced skull defects and implanted ECoG electrode strips; (3) Reliable statistical procedures to estimate and compare source connectivity (partial correlation). We provide solutions to the processing issues just mentioned with EECoG-Comp: an open source platform ( https://github.com/Vincent-wq/EECoG-Comp ). EECoG lead fields calculated with FEM (Simbio) for MDR data are also provided and were used in other papers of this special issue. As a use case with the MDR, we show: (1) For real MDR data, 4 popular ESI methods (MNE, LCMV, eLORETA and SSBL) showed significant but moderate concordance with a usual standard, the ECoG Laplacian (standard partial [Formula: see text]); (2) In both monkey and human simulations, all ESI methods as well as Laplacian had a significant but poor correspondence with the true source connectivity. These preliminary results may stimulate the development of improved ESI connectivity estimators but require the availability of more EECoG data sets to obtain neurobiologically valid inferences.

Indexed as

ArtifactsElectrocorticographyElectrodes, ImplantedElectroencephalographyHumansConnectivityECoGEEGElectrophysiological source imagingForward modelingMonkey electrophysiologyOpen science

Identifiers

PMID31209695
PMCPMC6592977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.