Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209664›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2019

The Changing Role of Gene-Expression Profiling in the Era of De-escalating Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

J E C van Steenhoven, A Kuijer, K Schreuder, S G Elias, P J van Diest, E van der Wall, S Siesling, T van Dalen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

J E C van SteenhovenDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. juliavansteenhoven@gmail.com.
A KuijerDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
K SchreuderDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S G EliasDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E van der WallDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S SieslingDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
T van DalenDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Diakonessenhuis hospital · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe assessed the recent trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy thereby evaluating the role of the 70-gene signature (70-GS) testing in decision-making in the systemic treatment of patients with lymph node negative (N0) and lymph node positive (N+) breast cancer.

methodsPatients with a national guideline directed indication for 70-GS use treated between 2013 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Time trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated within guideline- and age-delineated subgroups. The influence of the 70-GS on chemotherapy use was assessed with logistic regression.

resultsDuring the study period, the overall administration of adjuvant chemotherapy decreased from 49 to 23% and 70-GS use increased from 24 to 51%. The 70-GS was not associated with a decreased likelihood for N0 patients to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.17), as the proportion of N0 patients who received chemotherapy in the absence of 70-GS use decreased during the study period. In patients with N1a disease, 70-GS testing was associated with a decreased likelihood to receive chemotherapy (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.15-0.29). In patients < 50 years and 50-59 years of age, 70-GS use was associated with a consistent lower proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy throughout the study period (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.13-0.23 and OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.43-0.65, respectively).

conclusionsIn this population-based study, the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ breast cancer strongly declined. For node-positive and younger patients, 70-GS use was associated with a decreased probability for patients to receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingPatient SelectionAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDecision MakingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID31209664
PMCPMC6739278
OpenAlexW2973243834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.