Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209560›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2019

Oral vitamin A supplementation in very low birth weight neonates: a randomized controlled trial.

Sriparna Basu, Parul Khanna, Ragini Srivastava, Ashok Kumar

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sriparna BasuNeonatal Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. drsriparnabasu@rediffmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5048-4849
Parul KhannaNeonatal Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Ragini SrivastavaDepartment of Biochemistry, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Ashok KumarNeonatal Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Institute of Medical Sciences · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh · IN

Funding

NIL NOT APPLICABLE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluated the effects of early postnatal oral vitamin A supplementation (VAS) in 196 inborn very-low birth weight (VLBW) infants requiring respiratory support at 24 h of age. Eligible infants were randomized to receive aqueous syrup of vitamin A (10,000 IU of retinol/dose; n = 98) or placebo (n = 98) on alternate days for 28 days. Primary outcome variable was composite incidence of all-cause mortality and/or oxygen requirement for 28 days. Secondary outcome variables were safety/tolerability of VAS, serum retinol concentration at recruitment and day 28, duration of oxygen requirement and respiratory support and incidences of complications. On intention-to-treat analysis, composite incidence of all-cause mortality and oxygen requirement for 28 days was significantly lower in vitamin A group (relative risk (95% confidence interval), 0.440 (0.229-0.844); p < 0.05, number needed to benefit, 7). Requirement and duration of oxygen supplementation and non-invasive respiratory support, incidences of late-onset sepsis, patent ductus arteriosus, and duration of hospital stay were also significantly lower in vitamin A group. Serum retinol concentration improved significantly after VAS. No major adverse effect was observed.Conclusions: Early postnatal oral VAS was associated with better composite outcome of all-cause mortality and oxygen requirement without any major adverse effects.Clinical Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2017/03/008131). What is Known: • Postnatal intramuscular vitamin A supplementation improves the survival, respiratory outcome and other morbidities in very low birth weight neonates without major adverse effects. • Limited studies on oral vitamin A supplementation did not document substantial benefits. What is New: • Early postnatal alternate-day oral vitamin A supplementation at the dose of 10,000 IU/dose for 28 days improves the composite outcome of death and oxygen requirement in very low birth weight neonates with respiratory distress • No major adverse effects were documented.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightAdministration, OralCombined Modality TherapyDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleOxygen Inhalation TherapyRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeVitamin AVitamin AVitaminsNeonateOralVery low birth weightVitamin A supplementation

Identifiers

PMID31209560
OpenAlexW2952042820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.