ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2019
[Old wine in new bottles-proven open-surgical procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are increasing due to demographic factors. Increasing life expectancy and sociocultural demands of women require successful treatments that also have low complication rates. Classic open procedures such as colposuspension or colposacropexy (native tissue repair as well as mesh procedures) are experiencing a renaissance due to the current critical view of mesh-repair pelvic floor surgery and continue to be of great importance. With suitable patient selection, long-term results of abdominal procedures are on a par with minimally invasive techniques. Cosmetically acceptable results can be achieved with optimized incisions. The therapeutically relevant target for apical fixation is the elevation angle of the vagina (EAV). Minimally invasive mesh-based primary reconstructions and interventions for POP recurrence proved to be superior to conventional procedures due to good long-term results, lower recurrence rates and reduced early and late complication rates when anatomically correct and gentle surgery is performed with a critical selection of textile implants. Abdominal procedures are not inferior to minimally invasive techniques when instrumental suturing techniques and modern instruments are used. Adequate and critical information about surgical options and possible risks of complications should be provided in a timely manner. Education and training in modern diagnostics as well as in abdominal and current minimally invasive techniques and complication management should be implemented according to the guidelines and recommendations of professional societies, the Food and Drug Administration and the European Network of Information Centres.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.