Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209485›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2019

Deleterious Mutation Accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana Pollen Genes: A Role for a Recent Relaxation of Selection.

Mark C Harrison, Eamonn B Mallon, Dave Twell, Robert L Hammond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark C Harrison
Eamonn B Mallon
Dave Twell
Robert L Hammond
University of Münster · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many studies, sex-related genes have been found to evolve rapidly. We therefore expect plant pollen genes to evolve faster than sporophytic genes. In addition, pollen genes are expressed as haploids which can itself facilitate rapid evolution because recessive advantageous and deleterious alleles are not masked by dominant alleles. However, this mechanism is less straightforward to apply in the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana. For 1 Myr, A. thaliana has been self-compatible, a life history switch that has caused: a reduction in pollen competition, increased homozygosity, and a dilution of masking in diploid expressed, sporophytic genes. In this study, we have investigated the relative strength of selection on pollen genes compared with sporophytic genes in A. thaliana. We present two major findings: 1) before becoming self-compatible, positive selection was stronger on pollen genes than sporophytic genes for A. thaliana and 2) current polymorphism data indicate that selection is weaker on pollen genes compared with sporophytic genes. This weaker selection on pollen genes can in part be explained by their higher tissue specificity, which in outbreeding plants can be outweighed by the effects of haploid expression and pollen competition. These results indicate that since A. thaliana has become self-compatible, selection on pollen genes has become more relaxed. This has led to higher polymorphism levels and a higher build-up of deleterious mutations in pollen genes compared with sporophytic genes.

Indexed as

Mutation AccumulationArabidopsisDiploidyGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantHaploidyPloidiesPollenSelection, Geneticdeleteriousmaskingploidypollenpurifying selectionsporophyte

Identifiers

PMID31209485
PMCPMC6640295
OpenAlexW2951346709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.