Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209349›Full record

ArticleNature chemical biology2019

Electrophilic PROTACs that degrade nuclear proteins by engaging DCAF16.

Xiaoyu Zhang, Vincent M Crowley, Thomas G Wucherpfennig, Melissa M Dix, Benjamin F Cravatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 231 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 469 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Proteomics-Driven Strategies for Proximity-Inducing Drug Discovery.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. First Generation Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) for the Treatment of Progeria.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  18. Covalent Reprogramming of Kinase Binders to Modulate Protein Abundance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoyu ZhangThe Department of Chemistry and The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA. zhangx@scripps.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-9664
Vincent M CrowleyThe Department of Chemistry and The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Thomas G WucherpfennigThe Department of Chemistry and The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Melissa M DixThe Department of Chemistry and The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Benjamin F CravattThe Department of Chemistry and The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA. cravatt@scripps.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5330-3492
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Chemical Proteomic Platforms for Radically Expanding Cancer DruggabilityR35CA231991 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BENJAMIN F CRAVATT · 2018 to 2026
$9.5M
Chemical Approaches for Activity-Based ProteomicsR37CA087660 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CRAVATT, BENJAMIN F · 2009 to 2018
$3.1M
CHEMICAL APPROACHES FOR ACTIVITY BASED PROTEOMICSR01CA087660 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CRAVATT, BENJAMIN F · 2000 to 2008
$2.8M
Application of (chemo)proteomic methods to map cancer biochemical pathwaysR50CA211526 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SIMON, MELISSA DIX · 2016 to 2020
$843k
The Development of Organelle Specific Hsp90 Isoform-Selective InhibitorsK00CA212467 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI CROWLEY, VINCENT · 2018 to 2021
$316k
The Development of Organelle Specific Hsp90 Isoform-Selective InhibitorsF99CA212467 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI CROWLEY, VINCENT · 2016 to 2017
$63k
NCI NIH HHS F99 CA212467NCI NIH HHS K00 CA212467NCI NIH HHS R01 CA087660NCI NIH HHS R35 CA231991NCI NIH HHS R37 CA087660NCI NIH HHS R50 CA211526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ligand-dependent protein degradation has emerged as a compelling strategy to pharmacologically control the protein content of cells. So far, however, only a limited number of E3 ligases have been found to support this process. Here, we use a chemical proteomic strategy that leverages broadly reactive, cysteine-directed electrophilic fragments coupled to selective ligands for intracellular proteins (for example, SLF for FKBP12, JQ1 for BRD4) to screen for heterobifunctional degrader compounds (or proteolysis targeting chimeras, PROTACs) that operate by covalent adduction of E3 ligases. This approach identified DCAF16-a poorly characterized substrate recognition component of CUL4-DDB1 E3 ubiquitin ligases-as a target of electrophilic PROTACs that promote the nuclear-restricted degradation of proteins. We find that only a modest fraction (~10-40%) of DCAF16 needs to be modified to support protein degradation, pointing to the potential for electrophilic PROTACs to induce neosubstrate degradation without substantially perturbing the function of the participating E3 ligase.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugHEK293 CellsHumansLigandsMolecular StructureNuclear ProteinsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProteolysisStructure-Activity RelationshipLigandsNuclear ProteinsProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31209349
PMCPMC6592777
OpenAlexW2949485830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.