ReviewLeukemia2019
Laying the foundation for genomically-based risk assessment in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Review in Leukemia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in China (2025)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Guideline
- 2025 European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2025Guideline
- Article
- Impact of Somatic Mutations on Treatment Response and Resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026Article
- Asciminib as first-line therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review.Blood research · 2026Review
- Understanding drug resistance in chronic myeloid leukemia through the lens of leukemic stem cell states: insights from single-cell analyses.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Prognostic factors in chronic myeloid leukemia: at diagnosis and for treatment-free remission.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Article
- From fatal disease to functional cure: 25 years of tyrosine kinase inhibition in chronic myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2026Review
- Article
- Next-generation sequencing from chronic myeloid leukemia dried blood spots: insights and implications for global oncology.Leukemia · 2026Article
- An old leukaemia in young patients-Genetic characteristics of paediatric chronic myeloid leukaemia.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Article
- Genomic variant profiling in blast-phase paediatric chronic myeloid leukaemia: Predisposing and driving alterations.British journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- A CML Patient Carrying BCR::ABL1 Splicing Variants Did Not Experience Blast Crisis for 15 Years without Responding to Various TKIs.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Significance of Somatic Mutation Profiling in CML Beyond BCR-ABL: A Retrospective Study of the Indian Population.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025Article
- Article
- Blast Transformation of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Driven by Acquisition of t(8;21)(q22;q22)/Biomedicines · 2024Article
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have substantially improved due to advances in drug development and rational treatment intervention strategies. Despite these significant advances there are still unanswered questions on patient management regarding how to more reliably predict treatment failure at the time of diagnosis and how to select frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for optimal outcome. The BCR-ABL1 transcript level at diagnosis has no established prognostic impact and cannot guide frontline TKI selection. BCR-ABL1 mutations are detected in ~50% of TKI resistant patients but are rarely responsible for primary resistance. Other resistance mechanisms are largely uncharacterized and there are no other routine molecular testing strategies to facilitate the evaluation and further stratification of TKI resistance. Advances in next-generation sequencing technology has aided the management of a growing number of other malignancies, enabling the incorporation of somatic mutation profiles in diagnosis, classification, and prognostication. A largely unexplored area in CML research is whether expanded genomic analysis at diagnosis, resistance, and disease transformation can enhance patient management decisions, as has occurred for other cancers. The aim of this article is to review publications that reported mutated cancer-associated genes in CML patients at various disease phases. We discuss the frequency and type of such variants at initial diagnosis and at the time of treatment failure and transformation. Current limitations in the evaluation of mutants and recommendations for future reporting are outlined. The collective evaluation of mutational studies over more than a decade suggests a limited set of cancer-associated genes are indeed recurrently mutated in CML and some at a relatively high frequency. Genomic studies have the potential to lay the foundation for improved diagnostic risk classification according to clinical and genomic risk, and to enable more precise early identification of TKI resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.