Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209280›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2019

Laying the foundation for genomically-based risk assessment in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Susan Branford, Dennis Dong Hwan Kim, Jane F Apperley, Christopher A Eide, Satu Mustjoki, S Tiong Ong, Georgios Nteliopoulos, Thomas Ernst, Charles Chuah, Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in China (2025)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Significance of Somatic Mutation Profiling in CML Beyond BCR-ABL: A Retrospective Study of the Indian Population.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

Susan BranfordDepartment of Genetics and Molecular Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia. susan.branford@sa.gov.au.
Dennis Dong Hwan KimDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Jane F ApperleyCentre for Haematology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Christopher A EideDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
Satu MustjokiHematology Research Unit Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0816-8241
S Tiong OngCancer and Stem Cell Biology Signature Research Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Georgios NteliopoulosCentre for Haematology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Thomas ErnstAbteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Charles ChuahCancer and Stem Cell Biology Signature Research Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Carlo Gambacorti-PasseriniUniversity of Milano Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6058-515X
Michael J MauroMyeloproliferative Neoplasms Program, Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Brian J DrukerDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8331-8206
Dong-Wook KimCatholic Leukemia Research Institute, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Francois-Xavier MahonBergonié Cancer Institute, Inserm Unit 916, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Jorge CortesDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Jerry P RadichFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andreas HochhausAbteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Timothy P HughesSchool of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
International CML Foundation Genomics Alliance
Hammersmith Hospital · GBHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USJena University Hospital · DESingapore General Hospital · SGUniversity Health Network · CAFred Hutch Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSouth Australia Pathology · AUThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
CHRONIC MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA AND BCR-ABL SUBSTRATESR01CA065823 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DRUKER, BRIAN J · 1995 to 2021
$4.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA065823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcomes for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have substantially improved due to advances in drug development and rational treatment intervention strategies. Despite these significant advances there are still unanswered questions on patient management regarding how to more reliably predict treatment failure at the time of diagnosis and how to select frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for optimal outcome. The BCR-ABL1 transcript level at diagnosis has no established prognostic impact and cannot guide frontline TKI selection. BCR-ABL1 mutations are detected in ~50% of TKI resistant patients but are rarely responsible for primary resistance. Other resistance mechanisms are largely uncharacterized and there are no other routine molecular testing strategies to facilitate the evaluation and further stratification of TKI resistance. Advances in next-generation sequencing technology has aided the management of a growing number of other malignancies, enabling the incorporation of somatic mutation profiles in diagnosis, classification, and prognostication. A largely unexplored area in CML research is whether expanded genomic analysis at diagnosis, resistance, and disease transformation can enhance patient management decisions, as has occurred for other cancers. The aim of this article is to review publications that reported mutated cancer-associated genes in CML patients at various disease phases. We discuss the frequency and type of such variants at initial diagnosis and at the time of treatment failure and transformation. Current limitations in the evaluation of mutants and recommendations for future reporting are outlined. The collective evaluation of mutational studies over more than a decade suggests a limited set of cancer-associated genes are indeed recurrently mutated in CML and some at a relatively high frequency. Genomic studies have the potential to lay the foundation for improved diagnostic risk classification according to clinical and genomic risk, and to enable more precise early identification of TKI resistance.

Indexed as

Genes, NeoplasmHematopoiesisHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesRepressor ProteinsRisk AssessmentASXL1 protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31209280
PMCPMC6893870
OpenAlexW2950655888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.