Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209238›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Community assessment to advance computational prediction of cancer drug combinations in a pharmacogenomic screen.

Michael P Menden, Dennis Wang, Mike J Mason, Bence Szalai, Krishna C Bulusu, Yuanfang Guan, Thomas Yu, Jaewoo Kang, Minji Jeon, Russ Wolfinger and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 179 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
179citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

179 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Knowledge Graph Approach To Discovering Drug Combination Therapies Across The Phenome.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Michael P MendenOncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, SG8 6EH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0267-5792
Dennis WangOncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, SG8 6EH, UK.
Mike J MasonSage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5652-7739
Bence SzalaiDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1085, Hungary.
Krishna C BulusuOncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, SG8 6EH, UK.
Yuanfang GuanDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 48109, USA.
Thomas YuSage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5841-0198
Jaewoo KangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6798-9106
Minji JeonDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Korea.
Russ WolfingerSAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC, 27513, USA.
Tin NguyenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, 89557, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8001-9470
Mikhail ZaslavskiyIndependent Consultant in Computational Biology, Owkin, Inc., New York, NY, 10022, USA.
AstraZeneca-Sanger Drug Combination DREAM Consortium
In Sock JangSage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Zara GhazouiOncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, SG8 6EH, UK.
Mehmet Eren AhsenIBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, 10598, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4907-0427
Robert VogelIBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, 10598, USA.
Elias Chaibub NetoSage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Thea NormanSage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA.
Eric K Y TangOncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, SG8 6EH, UK.
Mathew J GarnettWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, CB10 1SA, UK.
Giovanni Y Di VeroliEarly Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, SG8 6EH, UK.
Stephen FawellOncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, R&D Boston, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Gustavo StolovitzkyIBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, 10598, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9618-2819
Justin GuinneySage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA, 98121, USA. justin.guinney@sagebionetworks.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1477-1888
Jonathan R DryOncology, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, R&D Boston, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA. jonathan.dry@astrazeneca.com.
Julio Saez-RodriguezEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK. julio.saez@bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8552-8976

Funding

GRADUATE TRAINING IN BIOINFORMATICST32ES007329 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Fred A. Wright · 2000 to 2026
$6.8M
Cancer Systems Biology Scholars ProgramR25CA180993 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
Drug repurposing in breast cancerR01CA204856 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUANG, RONG STEPHANIE · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Cancer Research UK 23187Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/13Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/2NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204856NCI NIH HHS R25 CA180993NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007329Wellcome Trust 204735/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effectiveness of most cancer targeted therapies is short-lived. Tumors often develop resistance that might be overcome with drug combinations. However, the number of possible combinations is vast, necessitating data-driven approaches to find optimal patient-specific treatments. Here we report AstraZeneca's large drug combination dataset, consisting of 11,576 experiments from 910 combinations across 85 molecularly characterized cancer cell lines, and results of a DREAM Challenge to evaluate computational strategies for predicting synergistic drug pairs and biomarkers. 160 teams participated to provide a comprehensive methodological development and benchmarking. Winning methods incorporate prior knowledge of drug-target interactions. Synergy is predicted with an accuracy matching biological replicates for >60% of combinations. However, 20% of drug combinations are poorly predicted by all methods. Genomic rationale for synergy predictions are identified, including ADAM17 inhibitor antagonism when combined with PIK3CB/D inhibition contrasting to synergy when combined with other PI3K-pathway inhibitors in PIK3CA mutant cells.

Indexed as

ADAM17 ProteinAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenchmarkingBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicDrug AntagonismDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug SynergismGenomicsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationNeoplasmsPharmacogeneticsADAM17 ProteinADAM17 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31209238
PMCPMC6572829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.