Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209237›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Comparative genomics of chytrid fungi reveal insights into the obligate biotrophic and pathogenic lifestyle of Synchytrium endobioticum.

Bart T L H van de Vossenberg, Sven Warris, Hai D T Nguyen, Marga P E van Gent-Pelzer, David L Joly, Henri C van de Geest, Peter J M Bonants, Donna S Smith, C André Lévesque, Theo A J van der Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Insights intoLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Identification of a Highly VirulentPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Two-speed genome evolution drives pathogenicity in fungal pathogens of animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. NeoR, a near-infrared absorbing rhodopsin.Nature communications · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Bart T L H van de VossenbergWageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Plant Science Group, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. b.t.l.h.vandevossenberg@nvwa.nl.
Sven WarrisWageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Plant Science Group, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9408-9151
Hai D T NguyenAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Canada.
Marga P E van Gent-PelzerWageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Plant Science Group, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
David L JolyUniversité de Moncton, 18 avenue Antonine-Maillet, Moncton, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-5558
Henri C van de GeestWageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Plant Science Group, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Peter J M BonantsWageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Plant Science Group, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Donna S SmithCanadian Food Inspection Agency, 93 Mount Edward Road, Charlottetown, Canada.
C André LévesqueAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3331-5741
Theo A J van der LeeWageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, Plant Science Group, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CACanadian Food Inspection Agency · CALaboratoire National de Référence · MAUniversité de Moncton · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synchytrium endobioticum is an obligate biotrophic soilborne Chytridiomycota (chytrid) species that causes potato wart disease, and represents the most basal lineage among the fungal plant pathogens. We have chosen a functional genomics approach exploiting knowledge acquired from other fungal taxa and compared this to several saprobic and pathogenic chytrid species. Observations linked to obligate biotrophy, genome plasticity and pathogenicity are reported. Essential purine pathway genes were found uniquely absent in S. endobioticum, suggesting that it relies on scavenging guanine from its host for survival. The small gene-dense and intron-rich chytrid genomes were not protected for genome duplications by repeat-induced point mutation. Both pathogenic chytrids Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and S. endobioticum contained the largest amounts of repeats, and we identified S. endobioticum specific candidate effectors that are associated with repeat-rich regions. These candidate effectors share a highly conserved motif, and show isolate specific duplications. A reduced set of cell wall degrading enzymes, and LysM protein expansions were found in S. endobioticum, which may prevent triggering plant defense responses. Our study underlines the high diversity in chytrids compared to the well-studied Ascomycota and Basidiomycota, reflects characteristic biological differences between the phyla, and shows commonalities in genomic features among pathogenic fungi.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalPhylogenyAscomycotaBasidiomycotaCell WallChytridiomycotaConserved SequenceFungal ProteinsGene DuplicationGene ExpressionGene OntologyGenetic VariationGenomicsGuanineHydrolasesMicrosatellite RepeatsFungal ProteinsGuanineHydrolases

Identifiers

PMID31209237
PMCPMC6572847
OpenAlexW2951590731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.