Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209091›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

The acceptability of addressing alcohol consumption as a modifiable risk factor for breast cancer: a mixed method study within breast screening services and symptomatic breast clinics.

Julia Sinclair, Mark McCann, Ellena Sheldon, Isabel Gordon, Lyn Brierley-Jones, Ellen Copson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Proteomics and its applications in breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Alcohol's Effects on Breast Cancer in Women.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Julia SinclairClinical and Experimental Sciences Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1905-2025
Mark McCannMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Ellena SheldonCore Trainee in Psychiatry, Peninsula Postgraduate Medical Education, Plymouth, UK.
Isabel GordonDepartment of Pharmacy Health and Well-being, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.
Lyn Brierley-JonesDepartment of Sociology, University of York, Wentworth College, York, UK.
Ellen CopsonCancer Sciences Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
University of Southampton · GBMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBPeninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry · GBUniversity of Sunderland · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKChief Scientist Office SPHSU14Medical Research Council MC/PC/13 027Medical Research Council MC_PC_13027Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/14Medical Research Council MR/P016960/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPotentially modifiable risk factors account for approximately 23% of breast cancers, with obesity and alcohol being the two greatest. Breast screening and symptomatic clinical attendances provide opportunities ('teachable moments') to link health promotion and breast cancer-prevention advice within established clinical pathways. This study explored knowledge and attitudes towards alcohol as a risk factor for breast cancer, and potential challenges inherent in incorporating advice about alcohol health risks into breast clinics and screening appointments.

designA mixed-method study including a survey on risk factors for breast cancer and understanding of alcohol content. Survey results were explored in a series of five focus groups with women and eight semi-structured interviews with health professionals.

settingWomen attending NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) mammograms, symptomatic breast clinics and healthcare professionals in those settings.

participants205 women were recruited (102 NHSBSP attenders and 103 symptomatic breast clinic attenders) and 33 NHS Staff.

resultsAlcohol was identified as a breast cancer risk factor by 40/205 (19.5%) of attenders and 16/33 (48.5%) of staff. Overall 66.5% of attenders drank alcohol, and 56.6% could not estimate correctly the alcohol content of any of four commonly consumed alcoholic drinks. All women agreed that including a prevention-focussed intervention would not reduce the likelihood of their attendance at screening mammograms or breast clinics. Qualitative data highlighted concerns in both women and staff of how to talk about alcohol and risk factors for breast cancer in a non-stigmatising way, as well as ambivalence from specialist staff as to their role in health promotion.

conclusionsLevels of alcohol health literacy and numeracy were low. Adding prevention interventions to screening and/or symptomatic clinics appears acceptable to attendees, highlighting the potential for using these opportunities as 'teachable moments'. However, there are substantial cultural and systemic challenges to overcome if this is to be implemented successfully.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUnited Kingdomalcoholbreast cancermixed methodsrisk factorsurvey

Identifiers

PMID31209091
PMCPMC6609127
OpenAlexW2952753700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.