Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208973›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2019

Home care and end-of-life hospital admissions: a retrospective interview study in English primary and secondary care.

Sarah Hoare, Michael P Kelly, Stephen Barclay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Challenges to timely access to out-of-hours end-of-life medications: a qualitative study in UK primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah HoarePrimary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Michael P KellyPrimary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Stephen BarclayPrimary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnabling death at home remains an important priority in end-of-life care policy. However, hospital continues to be a more prevalent place of death than home in the UK, with admissions at the end-of-life often negatively labelled. Admissions are frequently attributed to an unsuitable home environment, associated with inadequate family care provision and insufficient professional care delivery.

aimTo understand problems in professional and lay care provision that discourage death at home and lead to hospital admissions at the end of life. DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative study of admission to a large English hospital of patients close to the end of their life.

methodRetrospective in-depth semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (

resultsHome-based end-of-life care appeared precarious. Hospital admission was considered by healthcare staff when there was insufficient nursing provision, or where family support, which was often extensive but under supported, was challenged. In these circumstances, home was not recognised to be a suitable place of care or death, justifying seeking care provision elsewhere.

conclusionChallenges in home care provision led to hospital admissions. Home end-of-life care depended on substantial input from family and professional carers, both of which were under-resourced. Where either care was insufficient to meet the needs of patients, home was no longer deemed to be desirable by healthcare staff and hospital care was sought.

Indexed as

Terminally IllCommunity Health NursingHealth Services Needs and DemandHome Care ServicesHospice CareHospitalizationHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchRetrospective StudiesSecondary Health CareSocial SupportTerminal CareUnited Kingdomend of life carehome palliative carehospitalisationprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31208973
PMCPMC6582452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.