Trial reportBlood advances2019
A genomics-informed computational biology platform prospectively predicts treatment responses in AML and MDS patients.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02435550 (iCare for Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
iCare for Cancer Patients
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of genomic aberrations to predict clinical outcomes for patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Novel insights and therapeutic approaches in secondary AML.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- The relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia network (ReALLNet): a multidisciplinary project from the spanish society of pediatric hematology and oncology (SEHOP).Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- The effect of decitabine-combined minimally myelosuppressive regimen bridged allo-HSCT on the outcomes of pediatric MDS from 10 years' experience of a single center.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Precision Medicine in Hematology 2021: Definitions, Tools, Perspectives, and Open Questions.HemaSphere · 2021Review
- Myelodysplastic syndromes: moving towards personalized management.Haematologica · 2020Review
- Ex vivo drug screening defines novel drug sensitivity patterns for informing personalized therapy in myeloid neoplasms.Blood advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are generally older and have more comorbidities. Therefore, identifying personalized treatment options for each patient early and accurately is essential. To address this, we developed a computational biology modeling (CBM) and digital drug simulation platform that relies on somatic gene mutations and gene CNVs found in malignant cells of individual patients. Drug treatment simulations based on unique patient-specific disease networks were used to generate treatment predictions. To evaluate the accuracy of the genomics-informed computational platform, we conducted a pilot prospective clinical study (NCT02435550) enrolling confirmed MDS and AML patients. Blinded to the empirically prescribed treatment regimen for each patient, genomic data from 50 evaluable patients were analyzed by CBM to predict patient-specific treatment responses. CBM accurately predicted treatment responses in 55 of 61 (90%) simulations, with 33 of 61 true positives, 22 of 61 true negatives, 3 of 61 false positives, and 3 of 61 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 88%, and an accuracy of 90%. Laboratory validation further confirmed the accuracy of CBM-predicted activated protein networks in 17 of 19 (89%) samples from 11 patients. Somatic mutations in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.