Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208683›Full record

Observational studyBehavior therapy2019

A Sequential Analysis of Clinician Skills and Client Change Statements in a Brief Motivational Intervention for Young Adult Heavy Drinking.

Justin Walthers, Tim Janssen, Nadine R Mastroleo, Ariel Hoadley, Nancy P Barnett, Suzanne M Colby, Molly Magill

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Behavior therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justin WalthersBrown University, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Tim JanssenBrown University, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Nadine R MastroleoCollege of Community and Public Affairs, Binghamton University.
Ariel HoadleyBrown University, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Nancy P BarnettBrown University, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Suzanne M ColbyBrown University, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Molly MagillBrown University, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies. Electronic address: molly_magill@brown.edu.
John Brown University · USBinghamton University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
ALCOHOL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT OUTCOME RESEARCH TRAININGT32AA007459 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT MIRANDA, PETER M. MONTI · 1986 to 2026
$13.3M
Brief Alcohol Intervention for School-to-Work TransitionsR01AA016000 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI COLBY, SUZANNE M · 2009 to 2010
$1.1M
Intervention Ingredients and Mechanisms of an Efficacious Motivational InterviewR01AA023194 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MAGILL, MOLLY · 2014 to 2016
$957k
Informing treatment adaptation based on the interplay between behavioral undercontrol and context: an event-level studyK01AA026335 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI JANSSEN, TIM · 2018 to 2022
$904k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA026335NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016000NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023194NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined sequential relationships between clinician skills and client statements about behavior change in a randomized clinical trial comparing a brief motivational intervention (BMI) to a relaxation training control condition (REL) in a sample of heavy drinking young adults. Clinician and client interactions (N = 167) were assessed according to two established observational rating systems. Sequential analyses examined the transitional associations between clinicians' use of MI-eliciting skills (i.e., questions and reflections), MI-supportive skills (e.g., affirmations, emphasize client autonomy, statements of support), MI-inconsistent skills (e.g., confrontations, unsolicited advice), and subsequent client statements about behavior change (i.e., change talk or sustain talk). In both conditions, clinicians' use of MI-elicitation skills operated in a manner that was largely consistent (100% in BMI; 84% in REL) with the directional relationships proposed by MI theory (i.e., The Technical Hypothesis). More detailed analyses of the BMI condition showed clinician skills were related to statements about behavior change somewhat differently in drinking compared to coping discussions. While elicitations of change talk were associated with increased odds of their intended response (i.e., distal drinking and proximal coping change talk), elicitations of proximal coping sustain talk were associated with higher odds of proximal change talk. MI-supportive skills were also associated with increased odds of proximal change talk, and instances of proximal sustain talk were rare in the sample. This fine-grained analysis presents sequential transitions to client change and sustain talk with greater classification specificity than has been previously reported. Such efforts have the potential to advance our understanding of the function of MI skills in promoting client discussions about drinking (i.e., evoking) and coping (i.e., planning) behavior change.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceMotivationMotivational InterviewingAdaptation, PsychologicalAlcohol DrinkingFemaleHumansMaleProfessional-Patient RelationsRandom AllocationYoung Adultalcoholchange talkmechanism of behavior changemotivational interviewingsustain talk

Identifiers

PMID31208683
PMCPMC6582982
OpenAlexW2902660293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.