Trial reportZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics2019
[Clinical effect and safety of different maintenance doses of caffeine citrate in treatment of apnea in very low birth weight preterm infants: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
Trial report in Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methylxanthine for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of different maintenance doses of caffeine citrate on ventilator weaning in very preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021Trial
- Caffeine and preterm infants: multiorgan effects and therapeutic creep: scope to optimise dose and timing.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Caffeine dosing regimens in preterm infants with or at risk for apnea of prematurity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- [Recent research on gene polymorphisms related to caffeine therapy in preterm infants with apnea of prematurity].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022Review
- Caffeine for the Pharmacological Treatment of Apnea of Prematurity in the NICU: Dose Selection Conundrum, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Genetic Factors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the clinical effect and safety of different maintenance doses of caffeine citrate in the treatment of apnea in very low birth weight preterm infants.
methodsA total of 78 very low birth weight preterm infants with primary apnea were enrolled who were admitted from January 2016 to January 2018. They were randomly divided into high-dose caffeine group with 38 children and low-dose caffeine group with 40 children. Both groups received a loading dose of 20 mg/kg caffeine citrate, and 24 hours later, the children in the high-dose caffeine group were given a maintenance dose of 10 mg/kg, and those in the low-dose caffeine group were given a maintenance dose of 5 mg/kg. The two groups were compared in terms of response rate and incidence rate of adverse events.
resultsThe high-dose caffeine group had a significantly higher response rate than the low-dose caffeine group (71% vs 48%; P<0.05). Compared with the low-dose caffeine group, the high-dose caffeine group had significantly shorter duration of apnea and time of caffeine treatment (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in length of hospital stay and incidence rates of tachycardia, feeding intolerance, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intracranial hemorrhage (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the two groups (P>0.05).
conclusionsHigher maintenance dose of caffeine citrate has a better clinical effect than lower maintenance dose of caffeine citrate in the treatment of apnea in very low birth weight preterm infants, without increasing the incidence rates of adverse drug reactions and serious complications in preterm infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31208509PMC7389581W2991146473What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.