Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208469›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2019

Videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients.

Samir Jaber, Audrey De Jong, Paolo Pelosi, Luca Cabrini, Jean Reignier, Jean Baptiste Lascarrou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. [Video laryngoscopy in the intensive care unit-A current assessment].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Samir JaberPhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, Montpellier, France.
Audrey De JongPhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR 9214, Montpellier, France.
Paolo PelosiDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. ppelosi@hotmail.com.
Luca CabriniDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Jean ReignierMedicine Intensive Reanimation, University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Jean Baptiste LascarrouMedicine Intensive Reanimation, University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Nantes Université · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Saint Eloi · FRInstitute of Plant Protection · CNIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intubation is frequently required for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) but is associated with high morbidity and mortality mainly in emergency procedures and in the presence of severe organ failures. Improving the intubation procedure is a major goal for all ICU physicians worldwide, and videolaryngoscopy may play a relevant role.Videolaryngoscopes are a heterogeneous entity, including Macintosh blade-shaped optical laryngoscopes, anatomically shaped blade without a tube guide and anatomically shaped blade with a tube guide, which might have theoretical benefits and pitfalls. Videolaryngoscope/videolaryngoscopy improves glottis view and allows supervision by an expert during the intubation process; however, randomized controlled trials in the ICU suggest that the systematic use of videolaryngoscopes for every intubation cannot yet be recommended, especially in non-expert hands. Nevertheless, a videolaryngoscope should be available in all ICUs as a powerful tool to rescue difficult intubation or unsuccessful first-pass laryngoscopy, especially in expert hands.The use of associated devices such as bougie or stylet, glottis view needed (full vs incomplete) and patient position during intubation (ramped, sniffed position) should be further evaluated. Future trials will better define the role of videolaryngoscopy in ICU.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsLaryngoscopesLaryngoscopyVideo RecordingCritically illDirect laryngoscopyEmergency departmentIntensive care unitTracheal intubationVideolaryngoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31208469
PMCPMC6580636
OpenAlexW2952721496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.