Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208464›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2019

Psychometric properties of the St. Elizabeth Youngstown hospital wellbeing inventory and non-burnout inventory for physicians and nurses.

C Michael Dunham, Amanda L Burger, Barbara M Hileman, Elisha A Chance

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04153656 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Spiritual Flow Compendium on Nurse Wellbeing

TypeinterventionalSponsorMercy Health OhioRan2019 to 2022Enrolled39ConditionsBurnout, ProfessionalArmsReading and studying Spiritual Flow
NCT05977894 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Wellbeing Monitoring During Sequential Reduced Environmental Stimulation-Floatation

TypeobservationalSponsorMercy Health OhioRan2023 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsBurnout, Professional, Negative Affect, Positive Affect, WellbeingArmsReduced Environmental Stimulation Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C Michael DunhamTrauma, Critical Care, and General Surgery Services, St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital, 1044 Belmont Ave, Youngstown, OH, 44501, USA. dunham.michael@sbcglobal.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7842-9750
Amanda L BurgerBehavioral Medicine, St. Elizabeth Family Medicine Residency, 1053 Belmont Ave, Youngstown, OH, 44504, USA.
Barbara M HilemanTrauma and Neuroscience Research Department, St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital, 1044 Belmont Ave, Youngstown, OH, 44501, USA.
Elisha A ChanceTrauma and Neuroscience Research Department, St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital, 1044 Belmont Ave, Youngstown, OH, 44501, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians and nurses have substantial problems with wellbeing and burnout. We examined the reliability and construct validity of a wellbeing inventory (WBI) administered to some physicians and nurses working in St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital (SEYH).

methodsThe SEYH-WBI, consisting of 4 positive affect (PA) items and 7 negative affect (NA) items developed from 5 validated surveys, was administered (n = 419). A non-burnout inventory (SEYH-NBI) consisting of 2 PA items and 3 NA items was derived from the SEYH-WBI. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), a validated survey consisting of 10 PA items and 10 NA items, was conducted (n = 191). The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), a validated survey consisting of 3 domains (3 items each), was completed (n = 150).

resultsFor the SEYH-WBI, Cronbach coefficients were 0.76 for PA items and 0.83 for NA items. The NA item loading on factor 1 was 0.55-0.84 and the PA item loading on factor 2 was 0.47-0.89. Confirmatory indices were as follows: root mean square residual, 0.07 and Bentler Comparative Fit Index, 0.92. For the SEYH-NBI, Cronbach coefficients were 0.76 for PA items and 0.79 for NA items. The NA item loading on factor 1 was 0.80-0.87 and the PA item loading on factor 2 was 0.89-0.90. Confirmatory indices were as follows: root mean square residual, 0.02; and Bentler Comparative Fit Index, 0.99. PANAS correlations were as follows: SEYH-WBI PA and PANAS PA scores, r = 0.9; p <  0.0001; SEYH-WBI NA and PANAS NA scores, r = 0.9; p <  0.0001; SEYH-NBI PA and PANAS PA scores, r = 0.8; p <  0.0001; and SEYH-NBI NA and PANAS NA scores, r = 0.7; p <  0.0001. Correlations for SEYH-NBI and MBI were as follows: total NBI and total MBI, r = - 0.6, p <  0.0001; NA and emotional exhaustion, r = 0.6, p <  0.0001; PA and personal accomplishment, r = 0.3, p = 0.0003; and NA and depersonalization, r = 0.3, p = 0.0008.

conclusionsValidation assessments indicate that the SEYH-WBI and SEYH-NBI have acceptable psychometric performance. Similar findings in a larger cohort would be more compelling.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalSurveys and QuestionnairesFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansNursesPhysiciansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsAffectBurnout, professionalNursesPhysiciansPsychometric testingScale validationStress

Identifiers

PMID31208464
PMCPMC6580459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.