Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208448›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

Improved outcomes in patients with positive metal sensitivity following revision total knee arthroplasty.

Robert L Zondervan, Jonathan J Vaux, Michael J Blackmer, Brett G Brazier, Charles J Taunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert L ZondervanMichigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 965 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. rlz@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0825-4684
Jonathan J VauxMcLaren Orthopedic Hospital, 2727 S Pennsylvania Ave, Lansing, MI, 48910, USA.
Michael J BlackmerMcLaren Orthopedic Hospital, 2727 S Pennsylvania Ave, Lansing, MI, 48910, USA.
Brett G BrazierMichigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 965 Wilson Rd, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Charles J TauntMcLaren Orthopedic Hospital, 2727 S Pennsylvania Ave, Lansing, MI, 48910, USA.

Funding

Disruption of CD47 signaling promotes healing in ischemic fractures and bone allograftsF30AR071201 · NIAMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZONDERVAN, ROBERT LOUIS · 2017 to 2019
$126k
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases () F30AR071201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetal sensitivity as a cause for painful joint replacement has become increasingly prevalent; however, there is a lack of reported clinical outcome data from total knee arthroplasty patients with metal allergies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients presenting with a painful total knee arthroplasty with a positive metal sensitivity have improved outcomes following revision to a hypoallergenic implant.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted for patients that underwent a revision total knee arthroplasty after metal sensitivity testing over a 3-year period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017. Based on the results of sensitivity testing, patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty to a hypoallergenic component or a standard component. Following revision, patients returned to the clinic at an interval of 6 weeks, 5 months, and 12 months for functional, pain, and satisfaction assessment. Outcomes were compared within and between sensitivity groups.

resultsOf the included patients, 78.3% (39/46) were positive for metal sensitivity. The most common metal sensitivity was to nickel (79.5%, 32/39). Both non-reactive and reactive patients significantly improved in range of motion after revision arthroplasty. The reactive group saw a 37.8% decrease in pain at 6 weeks post-revision (p < 0.001) Whereas, the non-reactive group only saw a moderate, non-significant improvement in pain reduction at 6 weeks post-revision (27.0%; p = 0.29). Frequency of pain experienced did not vary significantly between groups. Maximum metal lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) sensitivity score did not correlate with pain level at the time of revision (R

conclusionsPatients presenting with a painful knee arthroplasty and positive metal LTT have improved pain scores, walking function, and range of motion following revision to a hypoallergenic component. This study also provides a treatment algorithm for patients presenting with a painful knee replacement, in order to provide effective and timely diagnosis and management.

Indexed as

ReoperationArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansHypersensitivityKnee ProsthesisMaleMetalsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeMetalsArthroplastyHipKneeLTTLymphocyte transformation testMetal allergyMetal sensitivityOrthopedics

Identifiers

PMID31208448
PMCPMC6580588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.