Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208434›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Probabilistic modeling of personalized drug combinations from integrated chemical screen and molecular data in sarcoma.

Noah E Berlow, Rishi Rikhi, Mathew Geltzeiler, Jinu Abraham, Matthew N Svalina, Lara E Davis, Erin Wise, Maria Mancini, Jonathan Noujaim, Atiya Mansoor and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Non-small cell lung cancer organoids: Advances and challenges in current applications.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Translational Aspects of Epithelioid Sarcoma: Current Consensus.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Is the era of sorafenib over? A review of the literature.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Noah E BerlowChildren's Cancer Therapy Development Institute, 12655 SW Beaverdam Road-West, Beaverton, OR, 97005, USA. noah@cc-tdi.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8666-3152
Rishi RikhiChildren's Cancer Therapy Development Institute, 12655 SW Beaverdam Road-West, Beaverton, OR, 97005, USA.
Mathew GeltzeilerDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Jinu AbrahamDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Matthew N SvalinaChildren's Cancer Therapy Development Institute, 12655 SW Beaverdam Road-West, Beaverton, OR, 97005, USA.
Lara E DavisDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Erin WiseChampions Oncology, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Maria ManciniChampions Oncology, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Jonathan NoujaimRoyal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Atiya MansoorDepartment of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Michael J QuistCenter for Spatial Systems Biomedicine Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Kevin L MatlockElectrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Martin W GorosDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Brian S HernandezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Yee C DoungDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Khin ThwayRoyal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Tomohide TsukaharaDepartment of Pathology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, 060-8556, Japan.
Jun NishioDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Elaine T HuangDepartment of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Susan AirhartThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA.
Carol J BultThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 04609, USA.
Regina Gandour-EdwardsDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UC Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Robert G MakiSarcoma Program, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell & Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Long Island, NY, 10142, USA.
Robin L JonesRoyal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
Joel E MichalekDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Milan MilovancevCarlson College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
Souparno GhoshDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA.
Ranadip PalElectrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, 79409, USA. ranadip.pal@ttu.edu.
Charles KellerChildren's Cancer Therapy Development Institute, 12655 SW Beaverdam Road-West, Beaverton, OR, 97005, USA. charles@cc-tdi.org.
Oregon Health & Science University · USTexas Tech University · USChildren's Cancer Therapy Development Institute · USInstitute of Cancer Research · GBThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USChampions Oncology (United States) · USJackson Laboratory · USCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USFukuoka University · JPOregon State University · USSapporo Medical University · JPUC Davis Health · US

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI William Carl Skarnes · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
San Antonio OAIC - Research Education Component (REC)P30AG044271 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Adam Salmon, Elena Volpi · 2015 to 2026
$14.1M
AAO-HNSF Grant N/AAAO-HNSF Saidee Keller Grant N/ACentralized Otolaryntology Research Effort N/ANational Science Foundation CCF0953366NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients with advanced disease routinely exhaust available clinical regimens and lack actionable genomic medicine results, leaving a large patient population without effective treatments options when their disease inevitably progresses. To address the unmet clinical need for evidence-based therapy assignment when standard clinical approaches have failed, we have developed a probabilistic computational modeling approach which integrates molecular sequencing data with functional assay data to develop patient-specific combination cancer treatments.

methodsTissue taken from a murine model of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma was used to perform single agent drug screening and DNA/RNA sequencing experiments; results integrated via our computational modeling approach identified a synergistic personalized two-drug combination. Cells derived from the primary murine tumor were allografted into mouse models and used to validate the personalized two-drug combination. Computational modeling of single agent drug screening and RNA sequencing of multiple heterogenous sites from a single patient's epithelioid sarcoma identified a personalized two-drug combination effective across all tumor regions. The heterogeneity-consensus combination was validated in a xenograft model derived from the patient's primary tumor. Cell cultures derived from human and canine undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma were assayed by drug screen; computational modeling identified a resistance-abrogating two-drug combination common to both cell cultures. This combination was validated in vitro via a cell regrowth assay.

resultsOur computational modeling approach addresses three major challenges in personalized cancer therapy: synergistic drug combination predictions (validated in vitro and in vivo in a genetically engineered murine cancer model), identification of unifying therapeutic targets to overcome intra-tumor heterogeneity (validated in vivo in a human cancer xenograft), and mitigation of cancer cell resistance and rewiring mechanisms (validated in vitro in a human and canine cancer model).

conclusionsThese proof-of-concept studies support the use of an integrative functional approach to personalized combination therapy prediction for the population of high-risk cancer patients lacking viable clinical options and without actionable DNA sequencing-based therapy.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAnimalsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDisease Models, AnimalDogsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHeterograftsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiceMice, Inbred NODPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligence and machine learningCombination therapyComputational modelingDrug screeningHigh-throughput sequencingPediatric cancerPersonalized therapySarcoma

Identifiers

PMID31208434
PMCPMC6580486
OpenAlexW2951116849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.