ArticleBMC cancer2019
Probabilistic modeling of personalized drug combinations from integrated chemical screen and molecular data in sarcoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epithelioid Sarcoma: A Review and Update.Cancers · 2026Review
- Drug Screening of Sarcoma Cells: Finding Shared Sensitivities.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Chronic arsenic exposure of ovarian surface and fallopian tube cultures induces giant and/or multinucleated cells with phagocytosis-like properties and an inflammatory phenotype.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2025Article
- Functional precision medicine: the future of cancer care.Trends in molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Non-small cell lung cancer organoids: Advances and challenges in current applications.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024Article
- Feasibility of functional precision medicine for guiding treatment of relapsed or refractory pediatric cancers.Nature medicine · 2024Observational
- Translational Aspects of Epithelioid Sarcoma: Current Consensus.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Review
- Potential of CDC25 phosphatases in cancer research and treatment: key to precision medicine.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Directional preference for glioblastoma cancer cell membrane encapsulated nanoparticle population: A probabilistic approach for cancer therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Functional genomic analysis of epithelioid sarcoma reveals distinct proximal and distal subtype biology.Clinical and translational medicine · 2022Article
- Functional impact of a germline RET mutation in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2021Article
- Predicting likelihood of in vivo chemotherapy response in canine lymphoma using ex vivo drug sensitivity and immunophenotyping data in a machine learning model.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2021Article
- Sarcoma treatment in the era of molecular medicine.EMBO molecular medicine · 2020Review
- Identification of low-dose multidrug combinations for sunitinib-naive and pre-treated renal cell carcinoma.British journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Deep Functional and Molecular Characterization of a High-Risk Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma.Sarcoma · 2020Article
- Is the era of sorafenib over? A review of the literature.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer patients with advanced disease routinely exhaust available clinical regimens and lack actionable genomic medicine results, leaving a large patient population without effective treatments options when their disease inevitably progresses. To address the unmet clinical need for evidence-based therapy assignment when standard clinical approaches have failed, we have developed a probabilistic computational modeling approach which integrates molecular sequencing data with functional assay data to develop patient-specific combination cancer treatments.
methodsTissue taken from a murine model of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma was used to perform single agent drug screening and DNA/RNA sequencing experiments; results integrated via our computational modeling approach identified a synergistic personalized two-drug combination. Cells derived from the primary murine tumor were allografted into mouse models and used to validate the personalized two-drug combination. Computational modeling of single agent drug screening and RNA sequencing of multiple heterogenous sites from a single patient's epithelioid sarcoma identified a personalized two-drug combination effective across all tumor regions. The heterogeneity-consensus combination was validated in a xenograft model derived from the patient's primary tumor. Cell cultures derived from human and canine undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma were assayed by drug screen; computational modeling identified a resistance-abrogating two-drug combination common to both cell cultures. This combination was validated in vitro via a cell regrowth assay.
resultsOur computational modeling approach addresses three major challenges in personalized cancer therapy: synergistic drug combination predictions (validated in vitro and in vivo in a genetically engineered murine cancer model), identification of unifying therapeutic targets to overcome intra-tumor heterogeneity (validated in vivo in a human cancer xenograft), and mitigation of cancer cell resistance and rewiring mechanisms (validated in vitro in a human and canine cancer model).
conclusionsThese proof-of-concept studies support the use of an integrative functional approach to personalized combination therapy prediction for the population of high-risk cancer patients lacking viable clinical options and without actionable DNA sequencing-based therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.