Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208414›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diabetology2019

New dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor agonist-Saroglitazar in diabetic dyslipidemia and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: integrated analysis of the real world evidence.

Upendra Kaul, Deven Parmar, K Manjunath, Mitesh Shah, Krupi Parmar, Kishor P Patil, Ashok Jaiswal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Upendra KaulBatra Hospital and Medical Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Deven ParmarZydus Discovery DMCC, Dubai, UAE.
K ManjunathZydus Research Centre, Cadila Healthcare Limited, Ahmedabad, India.
Mitesh ShahZydus Research Centre, Cadila Healthcare Limited, Ahmedabad, India.
Krupi ParmarZydus Research Centre, Cadila Healthcare Limited, Ahmedabad, India.
Kishor P PatilZydus Research Centre, Cadila Healthcare Limited, Ahmedabad, India.
Ashok JaiswalZydus Healthcare Limited, Zydus Tower, CTS No-460/6 of Village Pahadi, Off I. B. Patel Road, Goregaon (East), Mumbai, 400 063, India. ashokd.jaiswal@zyduscadila.com.
Cadila Healthcare (India) · INBatra Hospital and Medical Research Centre · INDubai Medical College · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaroglitazar, a novel dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) agonist, in clinical trials, has shown an improvement in lipid and glycemic parameters through the PPAR-α and γ agonist actions, respectively. It was granted marketing authorization in India in 2013 for diabetic dyslipidemia. This review was conducted to summarize the effects of Saroglitazar in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia in real world clinical studies conducted after marketing authorization in India.

methodsIn this review, we selected real world clinical studies of Saroglitazar published as manuscripts and abstracts presented at scientific conferences. In all these studies, patients with diabetic dyslipidemia were treated with Saroglitazar 4 mg once daily for at least 12 weeks and different lipid and glycemic parameters were measured at the baseline and end of the study.

resultsIn 18 selected studies (5 published manuscripts and 13 abstracts), a total of 5824 patients with diabetic dyslipidemia were prescribed Saroglitazar 4 mg for a duration ranging from 12 to 58 weeks. Across all the studies, mean age of patients ranged from 49.6 to 59.1 years and the proportion of female patients ranged from 22% to 42%. Across all the studies, there was a consistent mean reduction in triglyceride levels (~ 45% to 62%), total cholesterol levels (~ 17% to 26%), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (~ 21% to 36%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (~ 11% to 27%), and glycosylated hemoglobin levels (~ 0.7% to 1.6%) with an increase in mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (up to 9%) from baseline to end of the study. Saroglitazar also improved alanine aminotransferase levels and fatty liver (evaluated by FibroScan™) in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with diabetic dyslipidemia. Body weight remained unchanged and no significant adverse events (AEs) were reported in the studies.

conclusionSaroglitazar effectively improved lipid and glycemic parameters without significant AEs in patients with diabetic dyslipidemia in real-world clinical studies of up to 58 weeks duration.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DyslipidemiasFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsHypolipidemic AgentsIndiaLipidsMaleMiddle AgedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseasePhenylpropionatesPPAR alphaBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsPhenylpropionatesPPAR alphaPPARA protein, humanPPAR gammaPPARG protein, humanPyrrolessaroglitazarAlanine aminotransferaseDiabetic dyslipidemiaDual PPAR agonistGlycosylated hemoglobinNon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseSaroglitazarTriglyceride

Identifiers

PMID31208414
PMCPMC6580520
OpenAlexW2950722971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.