Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208391›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Gay and bisexual men's views on reforming blood donation policy in Canada: a qualitative study.

Daniel Grace, Mark Gaspar, David Lessard, Benjamin Klassen, David J Brennan, Barry D Adam, Jody Jollimore, Nathan J Lachowsky, Trevor A Hart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. MSM and blood donation: shifting to individualized risk assessment.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Undisclosed Sexual Risk Exposures: Results of a Nationwide Compliance Study among Whole Blood Donors in Germany.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Qualitative health research · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel GraceDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 5th Floor, Room 556, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada. daniel.grace@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9032-3959
Mark GasparDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 5th Floor, Room 510, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M7, Canada.
David LessardCentre for Health Outcomes Research, McGill University Health Centre, 5252 de Maisonneuve West, Montréal, QC, H4A 3S5, Canada.
Benjamin KlassenDepartment of History, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada.
David J BrennanFactor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor St W, Toronto, ON, M5S 1V4, Canada.
Barry D AdamOntario HIV Treatment Network, 1300 Yonge Street #600, Toronto, ON, M4T 1X3, Canada.
Jody JollimoreCommunity-Based Research Centre, 1007-808 Nelson Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2H2, Canada.
Nathan J LachowskySchool of Public Health & Social Policy, Faculty of Human & Social Development, University of Victoria, Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar, P.O. Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Trevor A HartHIV Prevention Lab, Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Blood Services (MSM Research Grant)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearchers and activists have long called for changes to blood donation policies to end what is frequently framed as unjustified bans or deferral periods for men who have sex with men (MSM). Since 2016, in Canada, a man had to be abstinent from all sexual contact (anal or oral sex) with other men for at least 12 months in order to be an eligible blood donor. As of June 3, 2019, this deferral period was reduced to 3 months.

methodsTo better understand the acceptance of existing deferral policies and possible future policy, we conducted 47 in-depth interviews with a demographically diverse sample of gay, bisexual, queer, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) in Canada's three largest cities: Vancouver, (n = 17), Toronto (n = 15), and Montreal (n = 15). Interviews were coded in NVivo 11 following an inductive thematic analysis. We focus on men's preferred policy directions and their opinions about a policy change proposed by Canada's blood operators: a 3-month deferral for all sexual activity between men. We interviewed GBM approximately one-year before this new deferral policy was approved by Health Canada.

resultsMost participants were opposed to any deferral period in relation to MSM-specific sexual activity. A fair and safe policy was one that was the "same for everyone" and included screening for several risk factors during the blood donation process with no categorical exclusion of all sexually active MSM. Participants believed that multiple "gender blind" and HIV testing-related strategies could be integrated into the blood donation process. These preferences for a move away from MSM-specific exclusions aligned with their opinions concerning the possible change to a 3-month MSM deferral, for which participants shared three overarching perspectives: (1) step in the right direction; (2) ambivalence and uncertainty; and (3) not an improvement.

conclusionA predominant assertion was that a change from a 12-month to a 3-month deferral period would not resolve the fundamental issues of fairness and equity affecting blood screening practices for GBM in Canada. Many participants believed that blood donation policy should be based on more up-to-date scientific evidence concerning risk factor assessment and HIV testing.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsPolicyAdultBisexualityCanadaHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBlood donation policyCanadaHIVMen who have sex with menQualitative

Identifiers

PMID31208391
PMCPMC6580549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.