Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208389›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2019

Study design of the Routine Outcome Monitoring for Geriatric Psychiatry & Science (ROM-GPS) project; a cohort study of older patients with affective disorders referred for specialised geriatric mental health care.

Richard C Oude Voshaar, Ton D F Dhondt, Mario Fluiter, Paul Naarding, Sanne Wassink, Maureen M J Smeets, Loeki P R M Pelzers, Astrid Lugtenburg, Martine Veenstra, Radboud M Marijnissen and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Cross-National Analysis of the Psychometric Properties of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Richard C Oude VoshaarUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. r.c.oude.voshaar@umcg.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1501-4774
Ton D F DhondtMental Health Center GGZ Noord-Holland Noord, Heerhugowaard, The Netherlands.
Mario FluiterMental Health Center GGZ Noord-Holland Noord, Heerhugowaard, The Netherlands.
Paul NaardingGGNet Mental Health, Division of Old Age Psychiatry, Warnsveld & Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
Sanne WassinkGGNet Mental Health, Division of Old Age Psychiatry, Warnsveld & Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.
Maureen M J SmeetsMental Health Center GGZ Centraal, Ermelo, The Netherlands.
Loeki P R M PelzersMental Health Center GGZ Centraal, Ermelo, The Netherlands.
Astrid LugtenburgMental Health Center GGZ Drenthe, Assen, The Netherlands.
Martine VeenstraUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Radboud M MarijnissenMental health Center Pro Persona, Arnhem/Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gert-Jan HendriksMental health Center Pro Persona, Arnhem/Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lia A VerlindeMental Health Center Mediant, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Robert A SchoeversUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rob H S van den BrinkUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAffective disorders, encompassing depressive-, anxiety-, and somatic symptom disorders, are the most prevalent mental disorders in later life. Treatment protocols and guidelines largely rely on evidence from RCTs conducted in younger age samples and ignore comorbidity between these disorders. Moreover, studies in geriatric psychiatry are often limited to the "younger old" and rarely include the most frail. Therefore, the effectiveness of treatment in routine clinical care for older patients and impact of ageing characteristics is largely unknown.

objectiveThe primary aim of the Routine Outcome Monitoring for Geriatric Psychiatry & Science (ROM-GPS) - project is to examine the impact of ageing characteristics on the effectiveness of treatment for affective disorders in specialised geriatric mental health care.

methodsROM-GPS is a two-stage, multicentre project. In stage one, all patients aged ≥60 years referred to participating outpatient clinics for specialised geriatric mental health care will be routinely screened with a semi-structured psychiatric interview, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview and self-report symptom severity scales assessing depression, generalized anxiety, hypochondria, and alcohol use. Patients with a unipolar depressive, anxiety or somatic symptom disorder will be asked informed consent to participate in a second (research) stage to be extensively phenotyped at baseline and closely monitored during their first year of treatment with remission at one-year follow-up as the primary outcome parameter. In addition to a large test battery of potential confounders, specific attention is paid to cognitive functioning (including computerized tests with the Cogstate test battery as well as paper and pencil tests) and physical functioning (including multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and different frailty indicators). The study is designed as an ongoing project, enabling minor adaptations once a year (change of instruments). DISCUSSION: Although effectiveness studies using observational data can easily be biased, potential selection bias can be quantified and potentially corrected (e.g. by propensity scoring). Knowledge of age-related determinants of treatment effectiveness, may stimulate the development of new interventions. Moreover, studying late-life depressive, anxiety and somatic symptom disorders jointly enables data-driven studies for more optimal classification of these disorders in later life.

trial registrationDutch Trial Register: NL6704 ( www.trialregister.nl ). Retrospectively registered on 2017-12-05.

Indexed as

Geriatric PsychiatryMental Health ServicesMood DisordersPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReferral and ConsultationAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAffective disorderAgedAged, 80 years and overAnxiety disorderCohortDepressive disorderRoutine outcome monitoringSomatic symptom disorderTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID31208389
PMCPMC6580500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.