Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208380›Full record

Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2019

Lumacaftor/ Ivacaftor improves exercise tolerance in patients with Cystic Fibrosis and severe airflow obstruction.

Peter A B Wark, Kim Cookson, Theeba Thiruchelvam, John Brannan, Douglas J Dorahy

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Clinimetric properties of field exercise tests in cystic fibrosis: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Guidance and standard operating procedures for functional exercise testing in cystic fibrosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter A B WarkCentre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Lookout Rd New, Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia. Peter.wark@newscastle.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-6126
Kim CooksonAdult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Theeba ThiruchelvamAdult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
John BrannanAdult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia.
Douglas J DorahyCentre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Lookout Rd New, Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of patients with Cystic Fibrosis homozygous for the Phe508del gene, with Lumacaftor /Ivacaftor (LUM/IVA) improves outcomes in patients with FEV1 > 40% predicted. We set out to observe the most sensitive clinical measure that would change with treatment in terms of exercise capacity or lung function in adults with severe lung disease as defined by an FEV1 < 40% predicted when clinically stable.

methods10 adults homozygous for the Phe508del received LUM/IVA. We assessed; six minute walk test (6MWT), spirometry, gas transfer (DLCO), plethysmography, and nitrogen multiple breath washout (MBW) at baseline, 4, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. Comparison was made with 10 matched historical controls that had been observed over 12 months.

resultsThere was a significant improvement in 6MWT by 4 weeks of treatment; with a mean increase of 78 m (SD 62.3) and this increased to 118.1 m (SD 80.9) (ANOVA p = 0.006) by 52 weeks. Significant improvements were also seen in the resting heart rate and the oxygen saturation (SaO2) after 6 min walking. A significant improvement was not seen in FEV1 though until 24 weeks, though this was maintained at 52 weeks (ANOVA, p = 0.0004). There were no significant differences seen in the MBW or DLCO. After 12 months treatment with LUM/IVA, in comparison to historical controls; the 6MWT increased by 118 m (SD 80.9), but fell in the controls - 61.3 m (SD 31.1). FEV1; LUM/IVA led to an increase of 0.398 L/min, compared to a fall in the controls - 0.18 (SD 0.2).

conclusionIn adults homozygous for Phe508del with severe disease, treatment with LUM/IVA results in a clinically significant improvement in 6MWT that was evident at 4 weeks and maintained at 52 weeks. Improvement in exercise tolerance is an important outcome to consider in those with more severe airways disease.

trial registrationThis was an observational trial conducted on individuals who became eligible to receive LUM/IVA. All investigations were carried out as part of routine clinical care. The trial was registered in retrospect on the 13/5/2019 on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials registry; ACTRN12619000708156 .

Indexed as

AdultAminophenolsAminopyridinesAustraliaBenzodioxolesCystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorDrug CombinationsExercise ToleranceFemaleGenotypeHomozygoteHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationAminophenolsAminopyridinesBenzodioxolesCFTR protein, humanCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorDrug Combinationslumacaftor, ivacaftor drug combinationQuinolonesCystic fibrosisIvacaftorLumacaftorLung transplantationSix minute walk testSpirometry

Identifiers

PMID31208380
PMCPMC6580585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.