Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31208070›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

A Systematic Review of the Epidemiologic Literature Assessing Health Outcomes in Populations Living near Oil and Natural Gas Operations: Study Quality and Future Recommendations.

Alison M Bamber, Stephanie H Hasanali, Anil S Nair, Sharon M Watkins, Daniel I Vigil, Michael Van Dyke, Tami S McMullin, Kristy Richardson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The human health effects of unconventional oil and gas development (UOGD): A scoping review of epidemiologic studies.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In Our Backyard: Perceptions About Fracking, Science, and Health by Community Members.New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alison M BamberDisease Control and Environmental Epidemiology Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO 80246, USA. allie.bamber@state.co.us.
Stephanie H HasanaliBureau of Epidemiology, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, PA 17120, USA. c-shasanal@pa.gov.
Anil S NairBureau of Epidemiology, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, PA 17120, USA. annair@pa.gov.
Sharon M WatkinsBureau of Epidemiology, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, PA 17120, USA. shawatkins@pa.gov.
Daniel I VigilDisease Control and Environmental Epidemiology Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO 80246, USA. daniel.vigil@state.co.us.
Michael Van DykeDisease Control and Environmental Epidemiology Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO 80246, USA. mike@mv2sci.com.
Tami S McMullinDisease Control and Environmental Epidemiology Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO 80246, USA. tmcmullin@cteh.com.
Kristy RichardsonDisease Control and Environmental Epidemiology Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO 80246, USA. kristy.richardson@state.co.us.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic method was used to review the existing epidemiologic literature and determine the state of the scientific evidence for potential adverse health outcomes in populations living near oil and natural gas (ONG) operations in the United States. The review utilized adapted systematic review frameworks from the medical and environmental health fields, such as Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE), the Navigation Guide, and guidance from the National Toxicology Program's Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT). The review included 20 epidemiologic studies, with 32 different health outcomes. Studies of populations living near ONG operations provide limited evidence (modest scientific findings that support the outcome, but with significant limitations) of harmful health effects including asthma exacerbations and various self-reported symptoms. Study quality has improved over time and the highest rated studies within this assessment have primarily focused on birth outcomes. Additional high-quality studies are needed to confirm or dispute these correlations.

Indexed as

Oil and Gas FieldsOil and Gas IndustryCongenital AbnormalitiesEnvironmental HealthHumansNeoplasmsNervous System DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesUnited Statesenvironmental healthepidemiologyfrackinghydraulic fracturingoil and natural gassystematic literature reviewunconventional oil and gas

Identifiers

PMID31208070
PMCPMC6616936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.