Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31207996›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Temporal Trends in Fecal Occult Blood Test: Associated Factors (2009-2017).

Ana Isabel Cobo-Cuenca, José Alberto Laredo-Aguilera, María-Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego, Esmeralda Santacruz-Salas, Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Isabel Cobo-CuencaDepartamento de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Terapia Ocupacional, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha (UCLM), 45071 Toledo, Spain. anaisabel.cobo@uclm.es.
José Alberto Laredo-AguileraDepartamento de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Terapia Ocupacional, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha (UCLM), 45071 Toledo, Spain. Josealberto.laredo@uclm.es.
María-Aurora Rodríguez-BorregoInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), 14004 Córdoba, Spain. en1robom@uco.es.
Esmeralda Santacruz-SalasDepartamento de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Terapia Ocupacional, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha (UCLM), 45071 Toledo, Spain. esmeralda.santacruz@uclm.es.
Juan Manuel Carmona-TorresDepartamento de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Terapia Ocupacional, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha (UCLM), 45071 Toledo, Spain. Juanmanuel.carmona@uclm.es.
Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ESUniversity of Castilla-La Mancha · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cross-sectional study with 27,821 records of non-institutionalized people in Spain aged between 50-69 years old (59.94 ± 5.8 years), who participated in the European Health Survey in Spain (2009, 2014) and National Health Survey (2011/12, 2017). Fecal occult testing, the reason for performing the test, age, sex, nationality, social status, marital status, education level, body mass index (BMI), and place of residence. Overall, 54% were women, 93.9% were Spanish, 47.8% had a secondary study, and 66.4% were married. Across the years, the rate of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) increased significantly (

Indexed as

Occult BloodAgedColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOdds RatioSpaincancer screeningcolorectal cancerpublic healthSpain

Identifiers

PMID31207996
PMCPMC6616453
OpenAlexW2951081433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.