Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31207609›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of internal medicine2019

Performance in the Medicare Shared Savings Program After Accounting for Nonrandom Exit: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.

Adam A Markovitz, John M Hollingsworth, John Z Ayanian, Edward C Norton, Phyllis L Yan, Andrew M Ryan

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam A MarkovitzUniversity of Michigan Medical School and School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan (A.A.M.).
John M HollingsworthUniversity of Michigan Medical School and Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan (J.M.H.).
John Z AyanianUniversity of Michigan Medical School, School of Public Health, Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, and Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan (J.Z.A.).
Edward C NortonUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, and Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (E.C.N.).
Phyllis L YanUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan (P.L.Y.).
Andrew M RyanUniversity of Michigan School of Public Health, Center for Evaluating Health Reform, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan (A.M.R.).

Funding

The Effects of Bundled Payment on Acute Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Older AdultsR01AG047932 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Andrew M Ryan · 2015 to 2026
$4.9M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024525AHRQ HHS R01 HS024728AHRQ HHS R36 HS025615NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accountable care organizations (ACOs) in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) are associated with modest savings. However, prior research may overstate this effect if high-cost clinicians exit ACOs. Objective: To evaluate the effect of the MSSP on spending and quality while accounting for clinicians' nonrandom exit. Design: Similar to prior MSSP analyses, this study compared MSSP ACO participants versus control beneficiaries using adjusted longitudinal models that accounted for secular trends, market factors, and beneficiary characteristics. To further account for selection effects, the share of nearby clinicians in the MSSP was used as an instrumental variable. Hip fracture served as a falsification outcome. The authors also tested for compositional changes among MSSP participants. Setting: Fee-for-service Medicare, 2008 through 2014. Patients: A 20% sample (97 204 192 beneficiary-quarters). Measurements: Total spending, 4 quality indicators, and hospitalization for hip fracture. Results: In adjusted longitudinal models, the MSSP was associated with spending reductions (change, -$118 [95% CI, -$151 to -$85] per beneficiary-quarter) and improvements in all 4 quality indicators. In instrumental variable models, the MSSP was not associated with spending (change, $5 [CI, -$51 to $62] per beneficiary-quarter) or quality. In falsification tests, the MSSP was associated with hip fracture in the adjusted model (-0.24 hospitalizations for hip fracture [CI, -0.32 to -0.16 hospitalizations] per 1000 beneficiary-quarters) but not in the instrumental variable model (0.05 hospitalizations [CI, -0.10 to 0.20 hospitalizations] per 1000 beneficiary-quarters). Compositional changes were driven by high-cost clinicians exiting ACOs: High-cost clinicians (99th percentile) had a 30.4% chance of exiting the MSSP, compared with a 13.8% chance among median-cost clinicians (50th percentile). Limitation: The study used an observational design and administrative data. Conclusion: After adjustment for clinicians' nonrandom exit, the MSSP was not associated with improvements in spending or quality. Selection effects-including exit of high-cost clinicians-may drive estimates of savings in the MSSP. Primary Funding Source: Horowitz Foundation for Social Policy, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and National Institute on Aging.

Indexed as

Cost SavingsAccountable Care OrganizationsAgedFee-for-Service PlansHip FracturesHospitalizationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMedicareQuality Indicators, Health CareSelection BiasUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31207609
PMCPMC8757576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.