Observational studyAnnals of internal medicine2019
Performance in the Medicare Shared Savings Program After Accounting for Nonrandom Exit: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.
Observational study in Annals of internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benefit design and consumer information: results from a randomized trial.The American journal of managed care · 2026Trial
- Spending Changes After Moving to Areas With Greater ACO Participation Among Nonattributed Medicare Beneficiaries.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Association between physician-hospital integration and inpatient care delivery in accountable care organizations: An instrumental variable analysis.Health services research · 2024Article
- Estimated Savings From the Medicare Shared Savings Program.JAMA health forum · 2023Article
- The impact of Medicare shared savings program participation on hospital financial performance: An event-study analysis.Health services research · 2023Article
- Association of Medicare Beneficiary and Hospital Accountable Care Organization Alignment With Surgical Cost Savings.JAMA health forum · 2022Article
- Medicare's Bundled Payments For Care Improvement Advanced Model: Impact On High-Risk Beneficiaries.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2022Article
- Does Hospital Admission/Observation for Chest Pain Improve Patient Outcomes after Emergency Department Evaluation for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome?Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Association of Primary Care Engagement in Value-Based Reform Programs With Health Services Outcomes: Participation and Synergies.JAMA health forum · 2022Observational
- Promise vs. Practice: the Actual Financial Performance of Accountable Care Organizations.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- ACO Awareness and Perceptions Among Specialists Versus Primary Care Physicians: a Survey of a Large Medicare Shared Savings Program.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Use of Preventive Care Services and Hospitalization Among Medicare Beneficiaries in Accountable Care Organizations That Exited the Shared Savings Program.JAMA health forum · 2022Article
- Impact of the Medicare Shared Savings Program on utilization of mental health and substance use services by eligibility and race/ethnicity.Health services research · 2021Article
- Impact of a commercial accountable care organization on prescription drugs.Health services research · 2021Article
- Ten-Year Evaluation of the Population-Based Integrated Health Care System "Gesundes Kinzigtal".Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021Observational
- Estimates of ACO savings in the presence of provider and beneficiary selection.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- A Selective Review of Negative Control Methods in Epidemiology.Current epidemiology reports · 2020Article
- Evaluation of US Hospital Episode Spending for Acute Inpatient Conditions After the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Article
- Proportion of Racial Minority Patients and Patients With Low Socioeconomic Status Cared for by Physician Groups After Joining Accountable Care Organizations.JAMA network open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Accountable care organizations (ACOs) in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) are associated with modest savings. However, prior research may overstate this effect if high-cost clinicians exit ACOs. Objective: To evaluate the effect of the MSSP on spending and quality while accounting for clinicians' nonrandom exit. Design: Similar to prior MSSP analyses, this study compared MSSP ACO participants versus control beneficiaries using adjusted longitudinal models that accounted for secular trends, market factors, and beneficiary characteristics. To further account for selection effects, the share of nearby clinicians in the MSSP was used as an instrumental variable. Hip fracture served as a falsification outcome. The authors also tested for compositional changes among MSSP participants. Setting: Fee-for-service Medicare, 2008 through 2014. Patients: A 20% sample (97 204 192 beneficiary-quarters). Measurements: Total spending, 4 quality indicators, and hospitalization for hip fracture. Results: In adjusted longitudinal models, the MSSP was associated with spending reductions (change, -$118 [95% CI, -$151 to -$85] per beneficiary-quarter) and improvements in all 4 quality indicators. In instrumental variable models, the MSSP was not associated with spending (change, $5 [CI, -$51 to $62] per beneficiary-quarter) or quality. In falsification tests, the MSSP was associated with hip fracture in the adjusted model (-0.24 hospitalizations for hip fracture [CI, -0.32 to -0.16 hospitalizations] per 1000 beneficiary-quarters) but not in the instrumental variable model (0.05 hospitalizations [CI, -0.10 to 0.20 hospitalizations] per 1000 beneficiary-quarters). Compositional changes were driven by high-cost clinicians exiting ACOs: High-cost clinicians (99th percentile) had a 30.4% chance of exiting the MSSP, compared with a 13.8% chance among median-cost clinicians (50th percentile). Limitation: The study used an observational design and administrative data. Conclusion: After adjustment for clinicians' nonrandom exit, the MSSP was not associated with improvements in spending or quality. Selection effects-including exit of high-cost clinicians-may drive estimates of savings in the MSSP. Primary Funding Source: Horowitz Foundation for Social Policy, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and National Institute on Aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.