Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31207555›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2019

A critical comparison of cellular and cell-free bioproduction systems.

Nico J Claassens, Simon Burgener, Bastian Vögeli, Tobias J Erb, Arren Bar-Even

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multi-scale reactor designs extend the physical limits ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Enzymatic Conversion of COChemical reviews · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nico J ClaassensMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany.
Simon BurgenerMax Planck Institute of Terrestrial Microbiology & LOEWE Research Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 10, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Bastian VögeliMax Planck Institute of Terrestrial Microbiology & LOEWE Research Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 10, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Tobias J ErbMax Planck Institute of Terrestrial Microbiology & LOEWE Research Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 10, 35043 Marburg, Germany. Electronic address: toerb@mpi-marburg.mpg.de.
Arren Bar-EvenMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany. Electronic address: bar-even@mpimp-golm.mpg.de.

Funding

European Research Council 637675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conversion of biological feedstocks into value-added chemicals is mostly performed via microbial fermentation. An emerging alternative approach is the use of cell-free systems, consisting of purified enzymes and cofactors. Unfortunately, the in vivo and in vitro research communities rarely interact, which leads to oversimplifications and exaggerations that do not permit fair comparison of the two strategies and impede synergistic interactions. Here, we provide a comprehensive account for the advantages and drawbacks associated with each strategy, and further discuss recent research efforts that aim to breach the limits of cellular and cell-free production. We also explore emerging hybrid solutions that integrate the benefits of both worlds and could expand the boundaries of biosynthesis.

Indexed as

Cell-Free SystemFermentationMetabolic Engineering

Identifiers

PMID31207555
PMCPMC7610769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.