ArticleEnvironment international2019
A comparative assessment of dilution correction methods for spot urinary analyte concentrations in a UK population exposed to arsenic in drinking water.
Article in Environment international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exposure to heavy metals in utero and autism spectrum disorder at age 3: a meta-analysis of two longitudinal cohorts of siblings of children with autism.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2024Pooled it
- The Association of Arsenic Metabolism and Blood Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in the MesoAmerican Nephropathy Occupational Study (MANOS).Research square · 2026Article
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients Show Higher Urinary Levels of Lead and Copper: A Pilot Case-Control Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of Urinary Metal Exposure on Blood Lipid Profiles in Chinese Adults: Mediating Roles of Health-Related Indicators.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Variable power functional dilution adjustment of spot urine.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The role of age and sex in non-linear dilution adjustment of spot urine arsenic.BMC nephrology · 2024Article
- Assessing the Impact of PMEnvironmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Characterization of multiple pesticide exposure in pregnant women in Brittany, France.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2024Article
- Exposure to heavy metalsmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Association of Prenatal Exposure to Organophosphate, Pyrethroid, and Neonicotinoid Insecticides with Child Neurodevelopment at 2 Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study.Environmental health perspectives · 2023Article
- A cross-validation based approach for estimating specific gravity in elementary-school aged children using a nonlinear model.Environmental research · 2023Article
- Environmental and human iodine and selenium status: lessons from Gilgit-Baltistan, North-East Pakistan.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2021Article
- Article
- Dietary fiber intake and urinary creatinine: methodological implications for epidemiological studies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Machine Learning for Investigation on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals with Gestational Age and Delivery Time in a Longitudinal Cohort.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Article
- Understanding the Relationship between Environmental Arsenic and Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness among African-American and European-American Men in North Carolina.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- The role of PSMB5 in sodium arsenite-induced oxidative stress in L-02 cells.Cell stress & chaperones · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Spot urinary concentrations of environmental exposure biomarkers require correction for dilution. There is no consensus on the most appropriate method, with creatinine used by default despite lacking theoretical robustness. We comparatively assessed the efficacy of creatinine; specific gravity (SG); osmolality and modifications of all three for dilution correcting urinary arsenic. For 202 participants with urinary arsenic, creatinine, osmolality and SG measurements paired to drinking water As, we compared the performance corrections against two independent criteria: primarily, (A) correlations of corrected urinary As and the dilution measurements used to correct them - weak correlations indicating good performance and (B) correlations of corrected urinary As and drinking water As - strong correlations indicating good performance. More than a third of variation in spot urinary As concentrations was attributable to dilution. Conventional SG and osmolality correction removed significant dilution variation from As concentrations, whereas conventional creatinine over-corrected, and modifications of all three removed measurable dilution variation. Modified creatinine and both methods of SG and osmolality generated stronger correlations of urinary and drinking water As concentrations than conventional creatinine, which gave weaker correlations than uncorrected values. A disparity in optima between performance criteria was observed, with much smaller improvements possible for Criterion B relative to A. Conventional corrections - particularly creatinine - limit the utility spot urine samples, whereas a modified technique outlined here may allow substantial improvement and can be readily retrospectively applied to existing datasets. More studies are needed to optimize urinary dilution correction methods. Covariates of urinary dilution measurements still warrant consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.