Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31207453›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2019

A predictive risk model for nonfatal opioid overdose in a statewide population of buprenorphine patients.

Hsien-Yen Chang, Noa Krawczyk, Kristin E Schneider, Lindsey Ferris, Matthew Eisenberg, Tom M Richards, B Casey Lyons, Kate Jackson, Jonathan P Weiner, Brendan Saloner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing opioid overdose risk: a review of clinical prediction models utilizing patient-level data.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hsien-Yen ChangJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins Center for Population Health Information Technology, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: hchang24@jhmi.edu.
Noa KrawczykJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Mental Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: noa.krawczyk@jhu.edu.
Kristin E SchneiderJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Mental Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: kschne18@jhmi.edu.
Lindsey FerrisJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: lferris1@jhu.edu.
Matthew EisenbergJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: eisenberg@jhu.edu.
Tom M RichardsJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins Center for Population Health Information Technology, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: tom.richards@jhu.edu.
B Casey LyonsMaryland Department of Health, Public Health Services, Office of PDMP and Overdose Prevention Applied Data Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: brianna.lyons@maryland.gov.
Kate JacksonMaryland Department of Health, Public Health Services, Office of PDMP and Overdose Prevention Applied Data Programs, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: kate.jackson@maryland.gov.
Jonathan P WeinerJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, MD, USA; Johns Hopkins Center for Population Health Information Technology, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jweiner1@jhu.edu.
Brendan SalonerJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: bsaloner@jhu.edu.

Funding

Assessing the relationship between opioid agonist therapy and risk of overdose and criminal justice involvement in Maryland: a population-based approachF31DA047021 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KRAWCZYK, NOA · 2018 to 2018
$45k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA047021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting which individuals who are prescribed buprenorphine for opioid use disorder are most likely to experience an overdose can help target interventions to prevent relapse and subsequent consequences.

methodsWe used Maryland prescription drug monitoring data from 2015 to identify risk factors for nonfatal opioid overdoses that were identified in hospital discharge records in 2016. We developed a predictive risk model for prospective nonfatal opioid overdoses among buprenorphine patients (N = 25,487). We estimated a series of models that included demographics plus opioid, buprenorphine and benzodiazepine prescription variables. We applied logistic regression to generate performance measures.

resultsAbout 3.24% of the study cohort had ≥1 nonfatal opioid overdoses. In the model with all predictors, odds of nonfatal overdoses among buprenorphine patients were higher among males (OR = 1.39, 95% CI:1.21-1.62) and those with more buprenorphine pharmacies (OR = 1.19, 95% CI:1.11-1.28), 1+ buprenorphine prescription paid by Medicaid (OR = 1.21, 95% CI:1.02-1.48), Medicare (OR = 1.93, 95% CI:1.63-2.43), or a commercial plan (OR = 1.98, 95% CI:1.30-2.89), 1+ opioid prescription paid by Medicare (OR = 1.30, 95% CI:1.03-1.68), and more benzodiazepine prescriptions (OR = 1.04, 95% CI:1.02-1.05). The odds were lower among those with longer days of buprenorphine (OR = 0.64, 95% CI:0.60-0.69) or opioid (OR = 0.79, 95% CI:0.65-0.95) supply. The model had moderate predictive ability (c-statistic = 0.69).

conclusionsSeveral modifiable risk factors, such as length of buprenorphine treatment, may be targets for interventions to improve clinical care and reduce harms. This model could be practically implemented with common prescription-related information and allow payers and clinical systems to better target overdose risk reduction interventions, such as naloxone distribution.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesBuprenorphineCohort StudiesDrug OverdoseDrug PrescriptionsFemaleForecastingHumansMaleMarylandMedicaidAnalgesics, OpioidBenzodiazepinesBuprenorphineOpiate AlkaloidsBuprenorphineOpioid analgesicsOpioid overdoseOpioid use disorderPredictive risk modelPrescription drug monitoring programs

Identifiers

PMID31207453
PMCPMC6713520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.