Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31207169›Full record

Trial reportArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2019

The Efficacy, Tolerability, and Joint Safety of Fasinumab in Osteoarthritis Pain: A Phase IIb/III Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Paula Dakin, Stephen J DiMartino, Haitao Gao, Jennifer Maloney, Alan J Kivitz, Thomas J Schnitzer, Neil Stahl, George D Yancopoulos, Gregory P Geba

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Mechanism-based nonopioid analgesic targets.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. JAK-STAT Signaling in Autoimmunity and Cancer.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paula DakinRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8925-0414
Stephen J DiMartinoRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York.
Haitao GaoRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York.
Jennifer MaloneyRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York.
Alan J KivitzAltoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, Pennsylvania.
Thomas J SchnitzerNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Neil StahlRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York.
George D YancopoulosRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York.
Gregory P GebaRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York.
Regeneron (United States) · USAltoona Center for Clinical Research · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo prospectively assess the efficacy, general safety, and joint safety of fasinumab, an anti-nerve growth factor monoclonal antibody, in osteoarthritis (OA) hip and/or knee pain.

methodsPatients with moderate-to-severe OA pain (knee or hip) and history of inadequate response or intolerance to analgesics were randomized to receive fasinumab (at 1 mg, 3 mg, 6 mg, or 9 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks over 16 weeks and were followed up to week 36. Efficacy end points were the change from baseline to week 16 in the pain and physical function subscale scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC), and patient global assessment (PGA) of OA. Joints were monitored at scheduled assessments (by plain film radiography and magnetic resonance imaging) during treatment and follow-up, and if prompted, at the time of active joint symptoms.

resultsOf the 421 patients randomized, 342 completed the 36-week study. All doses of fasinumab yielded statistically significant and clinically important reductions in pain compared to placebo (least squares mean difference in WOMAC pain subscale scores at week 16 ranging -0.78 to -1.40), without any clear dose dependence. Physical function and PGA scores improved in parallel. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates were 17% with fasinumab and 10% with placebo, and 4% and 1% of patients, respectively, discontinued treatment. Arthropathies (25 in total, 7% of fasinumab-treated patients and 1% of placebo-treated patients) occurred in a dose-dependent manner, with 2 occurring in patients receiving the lowest dose of fasinumab and 10 in patients receiving the highest dose. Most of the arthropathies (16 of 25) were discovered with scheduled radiographs and not based on symptoms. Destructive arthropathy (in 1 of 337 treated patients) occurred in 1 patient who was receiving 6 mg fasimumab.

conclusionFasinumab provided improvements in OA pain and function, even in those benefitting little from previous analgesics. The observed benefit-to-risk relationship favors further clinical development to explore the lowest doses of fasinumab in patients with knee or hip OA.

Indexed as

AgedAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedArthralgiaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritisOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementRadiographySeverity of Illness IndexAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedfasinumab

Identifiers

PMID31207169
PMCPMC6900077
OpenAlexW2949447363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.