Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31207136›Full record

SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2019

Surgical and Non-Surgical Treatment for 3-Part and 4-Part Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-Analyses.

Bai-Sheng Fu, Hong-Lei Jia, Dong-Sheng Zhou, Fan-Xiao Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bai-Sheng FuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Hong-Lei JiaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Dong-Sheng ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7621-0758
Fan-Xiao LiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1412-849X

Funding

China Scholarship Council (CSC) 201808080126Shandong Key R&D Program 2017GSF18112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses was conducted to propose a principle to make decisions for comparing clinical safety and efficacy of surgical and non-surgical treatment for displaced 3-part and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Three electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) were systematically searched to retrieve available published systematic reviews and meta-analyses comparing surgical versus non-surgical treatment for displaced 3-part and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Ten meta-analyses were identified for this investigation. Based on the application of selection with the Jadad algorithm, a meta-analysis including 6 randomized clinical trials was selected for this systematic review, which demonstrated the best available evidence that no statistically significant differences were found in the Constant score, health-related quality of life, and mortality between surgical and non-surgical treatments for displaced 3-part and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus; however, surgical treatment was associated with a significant increase in the incidence of reoperation. This systematic review of  overlapping meta-analyses reveals that although surgical treatment is more advantageous than and superior to non-surgical treatment for displaced 3-part and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus, the former leads to a higher incidence of postoperative complications.

Indexed as

Manipulation, OrthopedicFracture FixationHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicShoulder FracturesTreatment OutcomeFractures of the proximal humerusOverlapping meta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31207136
PMCPMC6595106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.